DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 575
[Docket No. NHTSA-2000-6859]
RIN 2127-AC64
Consumer Information Regulations;
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards;
Rollover Prevention
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for Comments.
SUMMARY: The agency believes that consumer information on the rollover risk of passenger cars and light multipurpose passenger vehicles and trucks would reduce the number of injuries and fatalities from rollover crashes. This information would enable prospective purchasers to make choices about new vehicles based on differences in rollover risk and serve as a market incentive to manufacturers in striving to design their vehicles with greater rollover resistance. The consumer information program would also inform drivers who choose vehicles with less rollover resistance that their risk of harm can be greatly reduced with seat belt use to avoid ejection.
DATES: COMMENT DATE: Comments must be received by (insert date 60 days following publication in the Federal Register).
ADDRESSES: All comments should refer to Docket No. NHTSA-2000-6859 and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20590. Docket hours are from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gayle Dalrymple, NPS-23, Office of Safety Performance Standards, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Dalrymple can be reached by phone at (202) 366-5559 or by facsimile at (202) 366-4329.
| SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: | |||||
| I. | Executive Summary | ||||
| II. | Background | ||||
| III. | Rulemaking History | ||||
| IV. | Recent Research on Maneuver-induced Rollover Crashes | ||||
| A. | Why Study Untripped Rollovers? | ||||
| B. | Estimate of the Annual National Incidence of On-road, Untripped Rollover Crashes | ||||
| C. | Dynamic Test Program | ||||
| 1. | Preliminary Steps | ||||
| a. | NASS Case Studies | ||||
| b. | ODI Complaints | ||||
| c. | Survey of Available Test Procedures | ||||
| 2. | Track Testing - Phase Ia | ||||
| 3. | Track Testing - Phase Ib | ||||
| 4. | Track Testing - Phase II | ||||
| a. | Test Vehicle Selection | ||||
| b. | Results | ||||
| 5. | Plans for Continuing Dynamic Test Research | ||||
| D. | How Do Dynamic Rollover Test Results Compare with Metrics? | ||||
| V. | Why Choose SSF? | ||||
| A. | Description of Metrics | ||||
| B. | Tripped and Untripped Rollover | ||||
| C. | Correlation and Causation | ||||
| D. | Simplicity and Measurability | ||||
| E. | Unintended Consequences | ||||
| VI. | Why not a Standard? | ||||
| VII. | Consumer Information Presentation | ||||
| A. | How Consumers Want to See Information Displayed | ||||
| B. | Converting SSF Measurements to Star Ratings | ||||
| VIII. | Rollover Information Dissemination through NCAP | ||||
| A. | Why NCAP Rather than Vehicle Labeling? | ||||
| B. | Addition of Rollover Resistance Stars to NCAP | ||||
| IX. | Rulemaking Analyses and Notices | ||||
| X. | Submission of Comments | ||||
| Appendix | |||||