Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
United States Department of Transportation
COMPLIANCE TESTING PROGRAM
MANUFACTURERS' RESPONSIBILITY
It is the responsibility of a manufacturer of vehicles and/or items of motor
vehicle equipment to certify that each motor vehicle and/or equipment item is
in full compliance with the minimum performance requirements of all applicable
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs). This is a
self-certification process as opposed to the type approval
process which is used in some other countries such as Japan. The NHTSA does
not issue approval tags, stickers or labels for vehicles or
equipment items before or after the first sale. In order to provide
certification, the manufacturer takes whatever actions it deems appropriate.
This usually means laboratory testing in accordance with the FMVSS or
conducting other studies or analyses (due care process) to ensure that its
products fully comply.
The manufacturer must not only be
concerned with the initial certification, but
should also monitor continued compliance
of vehicles and/or items of motor vehicle
equipment throughout the production run.
To accomplish this, an effective quality
control program must be established to
periodically inspect and test vehicles
and/or items of motor vehicle equipment
randomly selected from the assembly line
to ensure that the original performance is
carried through to all other units.
The Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance
(OVSC) does not specify the type of
quality control program that a
manufacturer should employ. That
decision is left to the manufacturer. If the
vehicle or item of motor vehicle
equipment is designed with a reasonable
factor of safety, the manufacturer can
elect to have a selective sample
surveillance program to demonstrate that
production variations will not take the
vehicle or item of motor vehicle
equipment out of the range of full
compliance. On the other hand, if the
margin of safety is less with respect to the
required performance, a more stringent
quality control program would be needed.
OVSC MISSION
Administer programs to ensure
compliance with Federal laws, standards
and regulations pertinent to vehicle
safety, fuel economy, damageability, and
consumer information. The approach
used is to develop an annual compliance
test program which includes an average
of 30 of the 44 testable FMVSSs (30
vehicle standards and 14 equipment
standards) and to randomly select test
samples from the marketplace and test
them to the minimum performance
requirements of the applicable standard.
In addition, vehicle inspections are
conducted at new car dealerships and
testing laboratories to visually verify
compliance to the 7 non-testable
FMVSSs. If a test failure occurs, an
investigation is conducted which could
ultimately lead to an owner notification
and remedy campaign along with a civil
penalty.
The investigative approach used is to
work closely with the manufacturer, on a
technical basis, to resolve the failure
issue. Typically, this procedure has led to
corrective action in the form of a
redesigned vehicle component or
equipment item or an improvement in the
manufacturer's quality control process.
Most manufacturers cooperate fully with
the OVSC during investigations and
institute changes when it becomes clear
that a revision in vehicle or equipment
item design or production procedures is
required in order to return to full
compliance. Manufacturers generally
maintain a strong quality control program
in the manufacture of vehicles and items
of motor vehicle equipment knowing such
an enforcement program is in place.
LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT
For any FMVSS compliance program, a
detailed OVSC Laboratory Test
Procedure must be developed and
continually upgraded. The FMVSS
specifies the minimum performance
requirements and, in general terms, the
objective tests required to demonstrate
product compliance. The OVSC
Laboratory Test Procedure specifies the
types of laboratory test equipment to be
used, testing tolerances, equipment
calibration requirements, step-by-step
instructions and check sheets, and
reporting requirements. The purpose of
the test procedure is two-fold.
1. Since all compliance testing is
conducted by contractors, it provides a
detailed description of the various
requirements to independent testing
laboratories (contractors) conducting
compliance tests for the OVSC. This
is very important to insure the quality
of the compliance test results which
could result in an owner notification
and remedy campaign along with a
civil penalty.
2. It provides a detailed description to the
vehicle and equipment manufacturers
of how the OVSC intends to verify that
the affected products meet the
minimum performance requirements
of applicable FMVSSs. Manufacturers
can use the OVSC Laboratory Test
Procedure as a guide in conducting its
own certification and product
surveillance tests, preferably testing
more stringently to ensure an
adequate margin of safety. OVSC
does not necessarily test for all
requirements, but the manufacturers
should do so.
The Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance
(OVSC) provides contractor laboratories
with Laboratory Test Procedures as
guidelines for obtaining compliance test
data. The data are used to determine if a
specific vehicle or item of motor vehicle
equipment meets the minimum
performance requirements of the subject
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS). The purpose of the OVSC
Laboratory Test Procedures is to present
a uniform testing and data recording
format, and provide suggestions for the
use of specific equipment and
procedures. If any contractor views any
part of an OVSC Laboratory Test
Procedure to be in conflict with a Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
or observes deficiencies in a Laboratory
Test Procedure, the contractor is required
to advise the Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative (COTR) and
resolve the discrepancy prior to the start
of compliance testing.
Every contractor is required to submit a
detailed test procedure to the COTR
before initiating the compliance test
program. The procedure must include a
step-by-step description of the
methodology to be used. The
contractor's test procedure shall contain a
complete listing of test equipment with
make and model number and a detailed
check-off sheet. The list of test
equipment shall include instrument
accuracy and calibration dates. All
equipment shall be calibrated in
accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions. There shall be no
contradictions between the Laboratory
Test Procedure and the contractor's in-house test procedure. Written approval of
the in-house test procedures shall be
obtained from the COTR before initiating
the compliance test program. The OVSC
Laboratory Test Procedures are not
intended to limit or restrain a contractor
from developing or utilizing any testing
techniques or equipment which will assist
in procuring the required compliance test
data. These Laboratory Test Procedures
do not constitute an endorsement or
recommendation for use of any product or
method. However, the application of any
such testing technique or equipment is
subject to prior approval of the COTR.
NOTE: The OVSC Laboratory Test
Procedures, prepared for the limited
purpose of use by independent
laboratories under contract to conduct
compliance tests for the OVSC, are not
rules, regulations or NHTSA
interpretations regarding the meaning of a
FMVSS. The Laboratory Test Procedures
are not intended to limit the requirements
of the applicable FMVSS(s). In some
cases, the OVSC Laboratory Test
Procedures do not include all of the
various FMVSS minimum performance
requirements. Recognizing applicable
test tolerances, the Laboratory Test
Procedures may specify test conditions
that are less severe than the minimum
requirements of the standard. In addition,
the Laboratory Test Procedures may be
modified by the OVSC at any time without
notice, and the COTR may direct or
authorize contractors to deviate from
these procedures, as long as the tests are
performed in a manner consistent with the
standard itself and within the scope of the
contract. Laboratory Test Procedures
may not be relied upon to create any right
or benefit in any person. Therefore,
compliance of a vehicle or item of motor
vehicle equipment is not necessarily
guaranteed if the manufacturer limits its
certification tests to those described in the
OVSC Laboratory Test Procedures.
CONTRACTOR SELECTION
The OVSC does not have the testing
facilities required to conduct compliance
tests. Testing is contracted to
approximately 21independent testing
laboratories located in Arizona, California,
Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey,
New York, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas,
Virginia and Wisconsin. Proposals are
solicited on a competitive basis from
those organizations expressing interest or
indicating a basic capability in the vehicle
and/or equipment testing field. The
proposals are evaluated and a selection
made on the basis of the proposer's
capability to conduct all phases of
compliance tests as outlined in the
particular FMVSS as well as the quoted
price per test (qualified low-bidder
selected).
TEST SPECIMEN PROCUREMENT
Information is requested to determine the
makes, models, styles and types of
vehicles and items of motor vehicle
equipment which are available in the
marketplace. Vehicle and equipment
selection matrices are developed which
include new entries into the marketplace,
new designs, past failures, consumer
complaints, etc. It is not possible to test
the majority of vehicle makes and models
or items of motor vehicle equipment due
to budget limitations. However, an effort
is made to select new entries and high
volume items. Vehicles are purchased
from new vehicle dealerships by obtaining
competitive bids on vehicles which have
the equipment as specified by the OVSC
safety compliance engineer. Equipment
items are selected at random from
manufacturing plants, distribution centers
or retail stores. This approach is used by
OVSC to ensure that the test specimens
selected are a true representation of the
product which could be purchased by the
consumer.
TEST TOLERANCES AND ACCURACIES
The conduct of compliance tests is quite
different from development or research
tests. It is extremely important that the
test be conducted within the criteria
specified in the particular FMVSS. The
reason for this is that a test failure could
lead to an owner notification and remedy
campaign along with a civil penalty for the
manufacturer. Such consequences can
be very expensive for the company
involved and the OVSC wants to be sure
that its test data are accurate. As a
general approach, test condition
tolerances are set on the conservative
side, and the width of the tolerance band
in any compliance test is established
based on the accuracy of test equipment
utilized.
The independent laboratories under
contract with OVSC are required to
conduct compliance tests in accordance
with the OVSC Laboratory Test
Procedures. The contractors are required
to write their own in-house test
procedures prior to conducting
compliance tests which cannot conflict
with the OVSC Laboratory Test
Procedures. It is the contractor's
responsibility to ensure that all tolerances
are maintained within the prescribed
bands. The test equipment must be
calibrated every 6 months unless
otherwise specified with traceability to the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST).
Laboratory testing activities are monitored
by OVSC safety compliance engineers,
who make periodic visits to ensure that
the correct procedures are being followed
and by reviewing recent test results for
accuracy. This includes verifying that
required instrumentation is in place,
functional, and the calibration data is
within specification and up to date. This
program helps to ensure that the
laboratory's in-house testing procedures
and equipment are within prescribed
guidelines.
PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONS (PEs)
&
COMPLIANCE INVESTIGATIONS (CIs)
The apparent failure of a compliance test
specimen is not, in itself, proof that the
particular vehicle or item of motor vehicle
equipment does not meet the
requirements of a particular FMVSS. It is,
however, an indication of a possible
problem and it triggers a comprehensive
technical investigation. One of the first
actions is to notify the manufacturer by
telephone of the test failure. This permits
the manufacturer to immediately take
action to check the adequacy of the
vehicles or items of motor vehicle
equipment involved. The manufacturer
then has the option of attending a
technical meeting at the test laboratory
with the OVSC compliance engineer.
During this visit, the manufacturer is given
the opportunity to review the test
procedure, test instrument calibration,
detailed test results, examine the failed
vehicle or equipment item, and question
the laboratory personnel. This is followed
by the initiation of a Preliminary
Evaluation (PE) file. A PE letter is sent to
the manufacturer requesting certification
test data along with inspection and other
quality control information. The PE letter
response data are analyzed by an OVSC
safety compliance engineer. After
completion of the analysis, a technical
meeting is held with the manufacturer's
representatives to discuss any unresolved
issues and any planned owner notification
and remedy action to be taken by the
manufacturer. After the technical
meeting, a decision is made as to whether
there is a strong indication of
noncompliance with FMVSS
requirements, and whether to upgrade the
investigation to a Compliance
Investigation (CI). A CI letter may be sent
to the manufacturer requesting additional
information. A retest also may be
conducted using an identical vehicle or
item(s) of motor vehicle equipment.
After all information is collected, OVSC
engineers conduct an intensive analysis
of the data with particular interest paid to
the tests conducted by the manufacturer
for original certification and in-process
quality control. In addition, the
certification test procedures and
equipment used by the manufacturer are
reviewed. Any differences between the
manufacturer's certification test results
and the OVSC compliance test results are
analyzed and an attempt is made to
ascertain the reasons for such
differences.
Based on all of the information available,
the OVSC Director makes a decision to
either close the PE file or CI file if a
noncompliance is not indicated or to
proceed with the investigation. A CI letter
is sent to the manufacturer stating that
the agency is proceeding with the
investigation and that the initiation of a
recall campaign by the manufacturer is
indicated. If there is no recall campaign
announced by the manufacturer, an initial
decision of noncompliance is made by the
Associate Administrator for Safety
Assurance and the case is forwarded to
the Chief Counsel's office for appropriate
legal action.
The process just described is the most
simplified case. In some instances, there
may be additional visits to the test
laboratory or the manufacturer's test and
manufacturing facilities, additional
technical meetings and correspondence
exchanges.
Once the case is forwarded to the Chief
Counsel's office, the processing
procedure is more formal. In accordance
with Public Law 89-563, the complete
process requires that after the initial
decision of noncompliance is made by the
Associate Administrator for Safety
Assurance, a public hearing is held to
afford the manufacturer or any other
interested party an opportunity to present
their views and then a final decision of
noncompliance may be made by the
agency Administrator.
SUMMARY
A compliance testing program has been in
place since 1968. All of the 44 testable
FMVSSs are included in a compliance
test program over a period of 5 years with
vehicle inspections conducted for the
remaining 7 non-testable FMVSSs. A
FMVSS self-certification program exists in
the United States. The NHTSA does not
certify that vehicles or items of motor
vehicle equipment meet the requirements
of various FMVSSs or issue "approval"
stickers, labels, certificates, etc. Each
year the OVSC randomly selects vehicles
and items of motor vehicle equipment for
compliance testing by approximately 21
independent testing laboratories under
contract with the OVSC to verify that the
manufacturer's certification is valid. The
OVSC compliance testing program is a
strong incentive for manufacturers of
vehicles and/or items of motor vehicle
equipment to institute and maintain a
strong quality control/product surveillance
program.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
FMVSSs
| 101- | Controls and Displays (Inspection) |
| 102- | Transmission Shift Lever Sequences, etc. (Inspection) |
| 103- | Windshield Defrosting and Defogging |
| 104- | Windshield Wiping and Washing |
| 105- | Hydraulic Brake System |
| 106- | Brake Hoses |
| 108- | Lamps, Reflective Devices etc. |
| 109- | Pass. Car New Pneumatic Tires |
| 110- | Pass. Car Tire Selection & Rims |
| 111- | Rearview Mirrors |
| 113- | Hood Latch Systems (Inspection) |
| 114- | Theft Protection |
| 116- | Hydraulic Brake Fluids |
| 117- | Retreaded Pneumatic Tires (Inspection) |
| 118- | Power-Operated Window Systems |
| 119- | Truck/Bus New Pneumatic Tires |
| 120- | Truck/Bus Tire Selection & Rims |
| 121D | Air Brake Systems (Dynamometer) |
| 121V | Air Brake Systems (Vehicles) |
| 122- | Motorcycle Brake Systems |
| 123- | Motorcycle Controls and Displays (Inspection) |
| 124- | Accelerator Control Systems |
| 125- | Warning Devices |
| 129- | Passenger Car New Non-Pneumatic Tires |
| 131- | School Bus Pedestrian Safety Devices |
| 135- | Passenger Car Brake Systems |
| 201- | Occupant Protection in Interior Impact |
| 201U | Occupant Protection in Interior Impact - Upper Interior Head Impact Protection |
| 201P | Rigid Pole Side Impact Test |
|
|
| 202- | Head Restraints |
| 203- | Impact Protection for the Driver from Steering Control |
| 204- | Steering Control Rearward Displacement |
| 205- | Glazing Materials (Inspection) |
| 206- | Door Locks and Door Retention Components |
| 207- | Seating Systems |
| 208- | Occupant Crash Protection |
| 209- | Seat Belt Assemblies |
| 210- | Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages |
| 212- | Windshield Mounting |
| 213- | Child Restraint Systems |
| 214D | Side Impact Protection (Dynamic) |
| 214S | Side Impact Protection (Static) |
| 216- | Roof Crush Resistance |
| 217- | Bus Window Retention and Release |
| 218- | Motorcycle Helmets |
| 219- | Windshield Zone Intrusion |
| 220- | School Bus Rollover Protection |
| 221- | School Bus Body Joint Strength |
| 222- | School Bus Passenger Seating |
| 223- | Rear Impact Guards |
| 224- | Rear Impact Protection (Inspection) |
| 301F | Fuel System Integrity - Frontal |
| 301L | Fuel System Integrity - Lateral |
| 301R | Fuel System Integrity - Rear |
| 301S | Fuel System Integrity - Sch Bus |
| 302- | Flammability of Interior Materials |
| 303- | Fuel System Integrity of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Vehicles |
| 304- | CNG Fuel Container Integrity |
|
REGULATION PARTS
| 512- | Confidential Business Information |
| 523- | Vehicle Classification |
| 525- | Exemptions from Average Fuel Economy Standards |
| 529- | Manufacturers of Multistage Automobiles |
| 531- | Passenger Car Average Fuel Economy Standards |
| 533- | Light Truck Fuel Economy Standards |
| 535 | 3-year Carryforward and Carryback of Fuel Economy Credits |
| 537- | Automotive Fuel Economy Reports |
| 541- | Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard |
| 542- | Procedures for Selection of Covered Vehicles |
| 543- | Petitions for Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard |
| 544- | Insurer Reporting Requirements |
| 552- | Petitions for Rulemaking, Defect and Noncompliance Orders |
| 554- | Standards Enforcement and Defect Investigation |
| 555- | Temporary Exemption from Motor Vehicle Safety Standards |
| 556- | Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance |
| 557- | Petitions for Hearings on Notification & Remedy of Defects |
| 565- | Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Content Requirements |
| 566- | Manufacturer Identification |
| 567- | Certification Regulation |
| 568- | Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More Stages |
| 569- | Regrooved Tires |
| 570- | Vehicle in Use Inspection Standards |
| 572- | Anthropomorphic Test Dummy |
| 572B | 50th Percentile Male (Hybrid II) |
|
|
| 572C | 3-year Old Child |
| 572D | 6-month Old Infant |
| 572E | Hybrid III Test Dummy |
| 572F | Side Impact Dummy (SID) 50th Percentile Male |
| 572I | 6-year Old Child |
| 572J | 9-month Old Child |
| 572K | Newborn Infant |
| 573- | Defect and Noncompliance Reports |
| 574- | Tire Identification and Record Keeping |
| 575- | Consumer Information Regulation |
| 575.103 | Truck-Camper Loading |
| 575.104 | Uniform Tire Quality Grading Standards |
| 577- | Defect and Noncompliance Notification |
| 579- | Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility |
| 580- | Odometer Disclosure Requirements |
| 581- | Bumper Standard |
| 583- | Automotive Parts Content Labeling |
| 585- | Automatic Restraint Phase-In Reporting Requirements |
| 586- | Side Impact Phase-In Reporting Requirements |
| 587- | Side Impact Moving Deformable Barrier |
| 588- | Child Restraint Systems Recordkeeping Requirements |
| 589- | Upper Interior Component Head Impact Protection Phase-in Reporting Requirements |
| 590- | Motor Vehicle Emission Inspections |
| 591- | Importation of Vehicles/Equipment Subject to Federal Safety Standards |
| 592- | Registered Importers (RIs) |
| 593- | Determination for Eligibility for Importation of Vehicles |
| 594- | Registered Importer (RI) Fee Schedule |
|
Issued by the Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance/NHTSA
Revised: August 18,1998