Rural Pickup Truck Drivers and Safety Belt Use: Focus Group Report

   

 

Technical Report Page

Executive Summary

Introduction

Defining the Problem

Fatalities

Gender and Other Characteristics

Laws Pertaining to Children and Cargo Areas

Focus Groups: Background

Moderator's Guide and Topics of Discussion

Focus Groups: Findings

Focus Group Participants' Attitudes Toward Safety Measures

Focus Group Participants' Safety Belt Use

Focus Group Participants' Responses to Specific Reasons/Approaches

Focus Group Responses to Existing Campaign Approaches - English-Speaking Group

Focus Group Responses to Existing Campaign Approaches - Hispanic Group

Campaign Component Development - English-Speaking Group

Campaign Component Development - Hispanic Group

Conclusions

References

List of Tables

List of Figures

Appendices

Home

 

 


APPENDIX B


STATE-BY-STATE

FATALITY AND EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN DATA (as of 2000)

Table B1 Statewide Pickup Truck Summary

State

Number of Pickup Truck Occupant Fatalities Statewide 1999

Pickup Truck Fatalities as a Percentage of Statewide Fatalities

State Pickup Truck Occupant Fatalities - as a Percentage of the Total National Pickup Truck Fatalities

Safety belt Law for Pickup Trucks Same as Passenger Vehicles

Separate Pickup Truck Crash, Injury, Fatality Data Available

Driver Passenger Cargo Area

Separate Pickup Truck Belt Use Data Available

Previous Pickup Truck Oriented PIE Campaigns

Future Pickup Truck PIE Planned

Expressed Interest in Participating

 

AL

207

22.5%

3.4%

.....T

T

T

T

..T

.....0

..0

.....N

AK

14

17.9%

.2%

.....0

0

0

0

..0

..... 0

...0

...... T

AZ
157
18.4%
2.8%

T

T

T

T

O
O
O
T

AR

149

26.2%

2.4%

T

T

T

T

T

T

0

N

CA

412

13.2%

6.7%

T

T

T

T

T

0

0

0

CO

109

16.4%

1.8%

T

T

T

T

T

T

0

T

CT

16

5.8%

.3%

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

DC

4

7.3%

.1%

T

0

0

0

0

0

0

T

DE

9

7.8%

.1%

T

T

P

P

0

0

0

T

FL

326

13.6%

5.3%

T

T

0

0

0

T

0

T

GA
267
18.5%
4.4%
N
P
T
T
T
O
T
T

HI

9

8.7%

.1%

T

P

0

0

T

T

0

T

IA

79

18.6%

1.3%

T

T

0

0

0

T

T

T

ID

56

26.9%

1.1%

T

T

T

T

T

0

0

T

IL
142
11.8%
2.3%
T
T
T
T
T
T
O
N

IN

127

15.2%

2.1%

N

T

P

0

T

0

0

T

KS

100

21.5%

1.6%

T

T

T

T

T

0

T

N

KY

156

19.9%

2.6%

T

0

0

0

T

0

0

T

LA

208

25.0%

3.4%

T

T

T

0

T

T

T

T

MA

35

9.0%

.6%

T

0

0

0

0

0

0

N

MT
59
26.8%
1.0%
T
P
P
P
T
O
O
N

NE

38

16.7%

.6%

T

T

T

0

0

0

T

T

NV

48

18.3%

.8%

T

T

T

P

0

0

0

T

NH

13

9.9%

2.0%

N

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NJ

27

4.6%

4.0%

T

T

T

T

0

0

0

N

NM

87

1.4%

22.7%

T

T

T

T

0

T

0

T

NY

86

1.4%

7.4%

T

T

T

P

T

0

0

N

NC

199

3.3%

14.7%

T

T

T

T

T

0

0

T

ND
28
.5%
27.5%
T
T
T
T
T
O
O
T

OH

165

2.7%

13.1%

T

T

T

T

T

0

T

T

OK

160

2.6%

25.8%

T

T

T

T

T

T

0

T

OR

82

1.3%

19.8%

N

T

T

0

0

0

0

T

PA

110

1.8%

8.3%

T

T

T

T

0

T

0

T

RI

6

.1%

8.7%

T

0

0

0

0

0

0

N

SC

150

2.5%

16.2%

T

T

T

T

0

0

0

T

SD

30

.5%

19.5%

T

T

0

0

0

0

0

T

TN

236

3.9%

20.4%

T

T

0

0

?

0

0

N

TX

781

12.8%

24.3%

T

P

P

P

T

0

0

0

UT

44

.7%

17.2%

T

T

T

0

0

0

0

T

VT
6
.1%
6.9%
T
P
P
P
O
O
O
T

VA

123

2.0%

15.0%

T

T

T

T

0

T

T

N

WA

84

1.4%

14.8%

T

P

P

P

T

0

T

T

WV

61

1.0%

17.7%

T

0

0

0

T

0

T

T

WI

118

1.9%

16.6%

T

T

T

T

T

0

T

T

WY

54

.9%

30.0%

T

T

T

T

0

T

T

0

PR

?

?

?

?

T

T

0

T

T

T

T

GU

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

0

ٱ = Yes
P = Partial
T = Tentative
N = No
0 = No response
? = Outstanding data

   
    Back to Home    
Continue to...Appendix B continues