Medical Conditions and Driving: A Review of the Literature (1960 – 2000)
TRD Page
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Section1: Introduction
Section 2: Vision
Section 3: Hearing
Section 4: Cardiovascular
Section 5: Cerebrovascular
Section 6: Peripheral Vascular
Section 7: Nervous System
Section 8: Respiratory
Section 9: Metabolic
Section 10: Renal
Section 11: Musculoskeletal
Section 12: Psychiatric
Section 13: Drugs
Section 14: Aging Driver
Section 15: Anesthesia and Surgery
Appendix A
List of Tables
List of Figures
download PDF

Section 7:
Diseases of the Nervous System

Epileptic Seizures and Driving Literature Review

Epileptic seizures, which can result in abrupt loss of consciousness or loss of bodily control, place the individual at risk for motor vehicle crashes if the seizure occurs while driving. Because of the potential for rapid incapacitation of the driver, and of the unpredictability of the illness, epilepsy is one of the few medical conditions with driving restrictions that are enforced almost worldwide. The first report of a motor vehicle crash as a result of a seizure was in the early 1900s (Thakwitzer, 1906). Since then, a number of studies have reported an increased risk of crashes in individuals with epilepsy, with rates of crashes for individuals with epilepsy ranging from 1.5 (Crancer and McMurray, 1968; Keys, Martin, Barrow, and Fabing, 1961) to 1.95 (Waller, 1965) times greater than controls. More recent studies are equivocal: Taylor, Chawick, and Johnson (1996) suggest that the crash rates of individuals with epilepsy are no greater than the general population, after adjusting for age, gender, driving experience, and mileage, whereas results from Diller et al. (1998) suggest that crash rates are elevated for individuals with epilepsy (see Table 16). Table 16 provides a summary of results from older and more recent studies investigating the risk of crashes in individuals with epilepsy.

The majority, if not all, of the studies examining the crash rates of individuals with epilepsy have methodological limitations. For example, many studies are based on self-report, using questionnaire surveys or clinical interviews (Gastaut, and Zifikin, 1987; Hasegawa, Gastaut, and Zifikin, 1991; Stanaway, Johnson, and Lambie, 1983; Takeda, Kawai, Fukushima, and Yagi, 1991, Taylor, Chawick, and Johnson, 1996). In those studies, estimations of the crash rates of drivers with epilepsy may, in fact, be underestimations given the propensity for under-reporting of crashes in this population due to fear of license revocation (Andermann et al., 1988; Salinsky, Wegener, and Sinnema, 1992). In other studies, individuals with epilepsy were identified through state licensing authorities (Popkin and Waller, 1989) or crash rates of persons with epilepsy were determined through police identification following a crash; individuals were then referred for a medical evaluation on suspicion of epilepsy (Vander Lugt, 1975). In those instances, crash rates of drivers with epilepsy may be inflated because individuals with moderate to severe epilepsy are likely to be overrepresented and individuals with fully controlled or infrequent seizures are likely to be under-represented.

As noted previously, results from earlier studies (e.g., Crancer and McMurray; Keys et al., 1961; Waller, 1965) suggest that individuals with epilepsy have increased crash risks. However, recent advances have resulted in improved medications for controlling seizures. Moreover, increased understanding by the medical community and by patients of the causes and effects of epilepsy has, undoubtedly, resulted in improved seizure control for many individuals with epilepsy.

Finally, few studies take into account factors such as sex, age, and driving exposure, factors known to affect crash rates in the general driving population. Noteworthy in this regard are the findings from Taylor et al. (1996) showing no differences in crash rates between individuals with epilepsy and those in the general population, once age, gender, driving experience, and mileage were controlled. However, results from that same study indicate that individuals with epilepsy have a 40 percent increased risk of more severe crashes than non-epileptic individuals.

Table 16 Summary of Studies Examining the Risk of Crash for Individuals with Epilepsy

Study

Sample Size

Methodology (Outcome measure)

Results

Waller (1965)

E = 580
C = 926

State recorded crashes.
(crashes/million miles).

E = 1.95 higher crash rates than comparison sample.

Van der Lugt (1975)

E = 155 H
C = all crashes in Netherlands in 1963

Police reports.
(# epileptic crashes/
total crash).

1:10,000 crashes caused by epilepsy.

Stanaway et al. (1983)

Seizures = 103

Survey. (crashes/1,000/year).

S = 5.5/1000/yr.
Pop = 4.3/1000/yr.

Gastaut & Zifikin (1987)

E = 82

Self-report.
i. Seizures while driving.

ii. Crashes as a result of seizure

17 percent - seizures while driving

52 percent - crash as a result of seizure.

Popkin & Waller (1989)*

E = 112
Known to DMV = 29
Unknown to DMV = 83

Driving records.
(crashes/100 drivers/ year).

Crashes/100 drivers/
year.
Known = 8.6.
Unknown = 6.7.
Population = 6.0.

Hanostia & Broste (1991)

E = 241

Population based retrospective cohort study (SMR).

SMR = 1.33 crashes.

Hasegawa et al. (1991)

E = 72

Self-report.
(crashes due to seizures).

25 percent of patients had one or more crashes due to seizures while driving.

Takeda et al. (1991)

Uncontrolled E = 858
Controlled E = 855
versus General Population

Prospective Questionnaire Survey.
(percent crashes/year).

Uncontrolled = 9.6 percent crashes/yr.

Controlled = 5.3 percent crashes/yr.

Population = 14.4 percent crashes/yr.

Taylor et al. (1996)

E = 16, 958
Population = 8,888

Questionnaire Survey. (crashes/last 5 years).

E (Odds Ratio) = .95.
(95 percent CI = .88 - 1.02).

Diller et al. (1998)

E** (unrestricted) = 33,499
E (restricted) = 1,112
Population = 921,774
(without medical conditions)

Probabilistic linkage of Utah DOT crash files, Utah Master Drivers License File, and Medical Condition Database.

Relative Risk (all crashes).
RR (unrestricted) = 2.42.
RR (restricted) = 1.74.

E

= Epilepsy

C

= Controls

H

= Identified by police following crash and referred for a medical evaluation on suspicion of epilepsy

SMR

= Standardized Mishap Ratio (estimate of risk in the affected group relative to risk in comparison group).

*

= Data collected in 1982

**

= Epilepsy and other episodic conditions (syncope, cataplexy, narcolepsy, hypoglycemia, episodic vertigo)

 

Back

Top

Next