|
TRAFFIC TECH
|
|||
|
|
Technology Transfer Series
Number 245 April 2001 |
||
|
SEAT
BELT USE SURGES IN MARYLAND, OKLAHOMA, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WITH
PRIMARY ENFORCEMENT
Primary enforcement,
sometimes called standard enforcement, means that a seat belt citation
can be written whenever a law enforcement officer observes an unbelted
driver or front seat passenger, just like all other traffic laws. Secondary
enforcement means a citation can be written only after a law enforcement
officer stops a vehicle for another traffic violation. Statewide observations
show that states with primary enforcement laws have higher belt use rates
than states with secondary enforcement laws. Seventeen states and the
District of Columbia had passed primary enforcement laws by the end of
2000. The states with primary enforcement laws averaged 77 percent belt
use, while the states with secondary enforcement averaged 64 percent,
a 13 percentage point difference.
Preusser Research
Group, Inc. conducted a study for the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) to evaluate changes in Maryland, Oklahoma, and
the District of Columbia when they upgraded to primary enforcement laws
in 1997. The upgraded laws are quite different. Maryland's applies to
front seat passengers and includes most motor vehicle types except US
Postal vehicles. The maximum penalty is $25. Oklahoma's law also applies
to front seat passengers but the fine was lowered from $32.50 to $20 under
primary enforcement. It does not cover US Postal Service vehicles on duty,
trucks, truck tractors, or vehicles primarily used on a farm. In Oklahoma,
a local jurisdiction has the right to adopt or not adopt any law passed
by the State Legislature. The District of Columbia law applies to front
seat occupants. It more than tripled the existing fine from $15 to $50
and it added a two-point license penalty for DC drivers. Taxis were added
to the list of vehicle types covered and taxi drivers failing to post
a required seat belt use sign in their cabs can be issued a $100 fine.
Seat Belt Use Results The national seat
belt use rate experienced small, but positive, gains from 1993 through
1997, and this trend is mirrored in the three jurisdictions. Large gains
were observed in the study states soon after their primary enforcement
laws went into effect.
Belt use showed no
improvement from 1993 to 1997 in Maryland, although the use rate continued
to be slightly above the national belt use rate. In 1998, after the primary
enforcement law took effect, belt use was observed to be 83 percent for
the state, +12 percentage points higher than the year before the law change
and +14 percentage points higher than the national average.
Belt use in Oklahoma
has been below the national use rate and little change occurred from 1993
through 1997, when usage ranged from 45 to 48 percent. Soon after primary
enforcement became effective the statewide rate increased to 56 percent,
+9 percentage points higher than the year before -- but still below the
national rate of 69 percent.
Belt use in the District
of Columbia did not increase from 1993 to 1996, when it remained below
the national average. Belt observations in June 1997 measured belt use
at 66 percent, +8 percentage points higher. The next year after primary
enforcement became effective, DC's use rate rose by 14 percentage points
to 80 percent, 11 percentage points above the national average.
Belt Use Demographics Observation data collected
in Maryland and Oklahoma included information on vehicle type, driver
sex and driver race; DC's did not. In Maryland, drivers of sport utility
vehicles were more likely wearing a seat belt in comparison to drivers
of passenger cars and vans. Pick-up truck drivers buckled up less often.
In Oklahoma, van drivers buckled up most often, followed by drivers in
passenger cars and sport utility vehicles. The noticeably lower proportion
of use among pick-up truck drivers in Oklahoma may have resulted in part
because these drivers are exempted if the pick-up is used on a farm. Females
wore seat belts more often than males in all jurisdictions.
Knowledge of the Law Driver data collected
in 1998, after the laws were in effect, showed that most strongly
agree (MD 71%; OK 70%; DC 73%) that seat belts make vehicle trips
safer. Most drivers (MD 85%; OK 72%; DC 78%) reported that they wear a
seat belt always when riding in a passenger vehicle. Many indicated
that they increased their use of belts (MD 44%; OK 51%; DC 46%) during
the previous year. Females reported using belts more than males and non-whites
were more likely than whites to have indicated an increase in use.
A majority (MD 87%;
OK 90%; DC 84%) understood that a primary law was now in place and most
believed there was at least a modest chance of receiving a seat belt ticket
if they did not buckle up (MD 78%; OK 80%; DC 69%). Whites (MD 42%; OK
38%; DC 14%) were less likely to believe that there was a high likelihood
of getting a ticket, compared to blacks (MD 50%; OK 51%; DC 42%), and
other non-whites (MD 56%; OK 56%; DC 46%). Only 22 percent of DC drivers
correctly reported that points can be assigned to their license for violating
the belt law.
Drivers Who Said They Got Tickets Some reported receiving
seat belt tickets (MD 14%, OK 9%, DC 11%). In all three states, males
reported getting more tickets than females. Drivers logging over 15,000
miles were most likely to have received a ticket (19%), compared to 14%
for those between 5,000 - 15,000 miles and 6% for those who drove less
than 5,000 miles. There was no difference in getting a seat belt citation
as a function of race in any of the study states.
Citations Issued The number of citations
issued increased as soon as primary enforcement became effective. In Maryland,
Oklahoma, and DC the increase continued through the end of the study period.
At the study community level, the level of increase depended on the particular
community. In some locations, citation data included race identifiers.
These data indicated
that there was either no difference in non-white versus white ticketing
or that a greater increase in ticketing went to whites following the change
to primary enforcement law.
HOW TO ORDER For a copy of Evaluation of Maryland, Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia's Seat Belt Law Change to Primary Enforcement (34 pgs plus appendices), write to the Office of Research and Traffic Records, NHTSA, NTS-31, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20590 or fax (2020 366-7096. Linda Cosgrove, Ph.D., was the contract manager. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Department of
Transportation
National Highway
Traffic
Safety Administration
400 Seventh
Street, S.W. NTS-31
Washington, DC 20590
Traffic Tech is a publication to disseminate information about traffic safety programs, including evaluations, innovative programs, and new publications. Feel free to copy it as you wish.
If you would like to receive
a copy contact:
Linda Cosgrove, Ph.D., Editor, Evaluation Staff
Traffic Safety Programs
(202) 366-2759, fax (202) 366-7096
E-MAIL: lcosgrove@nhtsa.dot.gov