SLIDE 1: Overview and Evaluation of the Automotive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test (ACAS FOT) Jack Ference, NHTSA Wassim Najm, RITA/Volpe Center SAE International 2005 Government/Industry Meeting Washington, D.C. May 9-11, 2005 SLIDE 2: Outline Program Overview: - Program Phases - System Description - FOT Description Evaluation Overview: - Analysis Framework - Safety Benefits Estimation - Rare Events - Unintended Consequences SLIDE 3: Rear-End Crash Problem [pie chart Rear end crash 28% [1,715.000] other crashes 72% * 2003 general estimates system data * light vehicle crash statistics * total 6,071,000 police-reported crashes SLIDE 4: Automotive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test (ACAS FOT) Program Sponsor: U.S. DOT/NHTSA Private Consortium: System Development and Build: GM/Delphi Conduct of Field Operational Test: UMTRI Independent Evaluator: U.S. DOT/RITA/Volpe Center SLIDE 5: SLIDE 6: SLIDE 7: SLIDE 8: SLIDE 9: SLIDE 10: FOT Exposure [pie charts] ACAS Disabled Total Distance Traveled 36,000 Km CCC: 21% Manual: 79% ACAS Enabled Total Distance Traveled 122,000 Km ACC: 36% Manual: 11% FCW: 53% SLIDE 11: Independent Evaluation Goals: Estimate Safety Benefits Determine Driver Acceptance Characterize System Capability SLIDE 12 Safety Impact 1. Driving Conflict Analysis – Global level examination of all FOT driving conflicts to develop quantitative estimates of overall safety benefits of ACAS. 2. Near Crash Analysis – Detailed Examination of the most severe near crashes to assess the usefulness of ACAS in preventing crashes. 3. Driver Impact Analysis – Examination of driver performance data to identify positive or unintended negative effects of ACAS on driving performance and behavior. SLIDE 13: Driving Conflict Analysis [flow chart] SLIDE 14: Driving Conflict Type and Intensity Driving Conflict Type - Conflicts: CAMP data from last-second response studies at comfortable braking or steering level. - Near crashes: CAMP data from last-second response studies at hard braking or steering level. Driving Conflict Intensity - Low-intensity: Quantified by TTC versus Range rate diagrams derived from CAMP’s 50%-ile data. - High-intensity: Quantified by TTC versus Range rate diagrams derived from CAMP’s 95%-ile data. SLIDE 15: Driving Conflict Identification SLIDE 16: CONFLICT TYPE AND INTENSITY CLASSIFICATION SLIDE 17: Safety Benefits Estimation SLIDE 18: EXPOSURE RATIO ANALYSIS Analysis: Comparison between ACAS disabled (1st week) and 2nd half distance traveled with ACAS enabled. Dynamic Scenarios: Lead vehicle stopped Lead vehicle moving at slower constant speed Lead vehicle decelerating Measures of Performance: MOP1= No. of conflicts per 100 Km traveled MOP2= No. of near crashes per 100 Km traveled SLIDE 19: PREVENTION RATIO ANALYSIS Driver Response Analysis: Initiation Measures: Time-to-collision Time headway Intensity Measures: Minimum time-to-collision Peak acceleration Average acceleration Prevention Ratio Estimation: Monte Carlo simulations based on data from bins with statistically significant difference in response initiation SLIDE 20: Rare Events Analysis of severe near crashes based on response intensity using aggregate numerical data: - TTCmin 0.3g Analysis of video episodes triggered by crash imminent alerts that might have prevented a rear-end crash: - Driver distraction - High peak deceleration SLIDE 21: Unintended Consequences Analysis of low risk (host vehicle @ constant speed) driving performance using numerical data: - Time headway - Position within travel lane - Speed ratio (vehicle speed/speed limit) Analysis of inattention (distraction or eyes-off-the-road) using alert-triggered video episodes. Anecdotal remarks based on few observations. SLIDE 22: OBSERVATIONS SLIDE 23: Questions? For further information on ACAS FOT program: Contact Jack Ference: Tel. (202) 366-0168 E-mail: Jack.Ference@nhtsa.dot.gov Visit web site: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-12/pubs_rev.html