As a Federal agency, NHTSA regulates the safety of motor vehicles and related equipment.
POLICY & GUIDANCE
Guidance DocumentsLETTER OF INTERPRETATION
Letters from NHTSA's Chief CounselREPORTS TO CONGRESS
Evaluation & UpdatesStanding General Order
Crash Reporting for Levels of Driving Automation 2-5Part 583 AALA Reports
American Automobile Labeling Act ReportsSettlement Amounts since FY-1999
Civil Penalty Settlement AmountsRegulations
NHTSA issues Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) to implement laws from Congress. These regulations allow us to fulfill our mission to prevent and reduce vehicle crashes.
FMVSS Number | Part Sort ascending | Subject | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
208 |
49 CFR Part 552, 571, 585, 595 |
Occupant Crash Protection The agency is proposing to upgrade the agency's occupant protection standard to require advanced air bags. |
Final Rule; Interim Final Rule - Occupant Crash ProtectionSupplemental notice of proposed rulemaking |
208 |
49 CFR Part 552, 571, 585, 595 |
Occupant Crash Protection The agency is proposing to upgrade the agency's occupant protection standard to require advanced air bags. |
Final rule; Interim Final Rule: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Occupant Crash ProtectionSupplemental notice of proposed rulemaking |
208 |
49 CFR Part 552, 571, 585, 595 |
Occupant Crash Protection The agency is proposing to upgrade the agency's occupant protection standard to require advanced air bags. |
Final Rule; Interim Final Rule: Occupant Crash ProtectionSupplemental notice of proposed rulemaking |
49 CFR Part 538 |
Automobile Fuel Economy Manufacturing Incentives for Alternative Fueled Vehicles This final rule extends the incentive created by the Alternative Motor Fuels Act of 1988 (AMFA) to encourage the continued production of motor vehicles capable of operating on alternative fuels for four additional model years covering model years (MY) 2005 to MY 2008. Under the special procedures for calculating the fuel economy of those vehicles contained in AMFA, alternative and dual fueled vehicles are assigned a higher fuel economy value for CAFE purposes, which can result in manufacturers earning credits for their fleets. The final rule limits the maximum amount of credit that may be applied to any manufacturers' fleet to 0.9 mpg per fleet during MY 2005 - MY 2008. |
Final Rule | |
49 CFR Part 538 |
Under 49 CFR Part 538, Automotive Fuel Economy Manufacturing Incentives for Alternative Fuel Vehicles To provide an incentive for the production of vehicles that can operate on certain alternative fuels as well as on regular petroleum fuels, Congress established a special procedure for calculating the fuel economy of those vehicles for determining compliance with the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards. |
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) | |
49 CFR Part 533 |
Light Truck Average Fuel Economy Standards, Model Years 2005-2007 This final rule established the average fuel economy standards for light trucks that will be manufactured in the 2005-2007 model years (MYs). Chapter 329 of Title 49 of the United States Code requires the issuance of these standards. The standards for all light trucks manufactured by a manufacturer is set at 21.0 mpg for MY 2005, 21.6 mpg for MY 2006, and 22.2 mpg for MY 2007. This rule is effective May 5, 2003. |
Final Environmental Assessment: Light Truck Fuel Economy Standards Final Economic Assessment: Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for MY 2005-2007 Light TrucksFinal Rule |
|
49 CFR Part 533 |
Reforming the Automobile Fuel Economy Standards Program This document seeks comment on various issues relating to the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) program. In particular, this document seeks comments relating to possible enhancements to the program that will assist in furthering fuel conservation while protecting motor vehicle safety and the economic vitality of the auto industry. The agency is particularly interested in improvements to the structure of the CAFE program authorized under current statutory authority. The focus of this document is to solicit comments on the structure of the CAFE program, not the stringency level for a future CAFE standard. |
Request for Comments Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking |
|
49 CFR Part 512 |
TREAD: Confidential Business Information | Final Rule | |
49 CFR Part 301 |
Fuel System Integrity | Preliminary Regulatory Evaluation | |
49 CFR Part 213, 225 |
Child Restraint Systems Child restraint systems are the most effective way to protect young children involved in motor vehicle crashes. |
Final Economic Assessment | |
49 CFR Part 213 |
Child Restraint Anchorage Systems | Final Economic Assessment Proposed Amendment, Preliminary Regulatory Evaluation Preliminary Economic Assessment Preliminary Regulatory Evaluation |
|
49 CFR Part 139 |
New Pneumatic Tires for Light Vehicles | Preliminary Economic Assessment | |
Draft Environmental Assessment The draft environmental assessment evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with NHTSA’s proposed action to set Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for model year 2008-2011 light trucks. This document describes the environment and resources that might be affected by the proposed light truck CAFE standards for model years 2008-2011, and assesses estimated impacts of alternative actions. |
Draft of the Environmental Assessment Proposed Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards for Model Year 2008-2011 Light Trucks | ||
Nissan North America, Inc. Petition for Exemption from Two-Fleet Rule Affecting Compliance with Passenger Automobile Fuel Economy Standards Nissan filed a petition requesting exemption from the two fleet rule for the 2006-2010 model years. The two fleet rule, which is contained in the CAFE statute, requires that a manufacturer divide its passenger automobiles into two fleets, a domestically-manufactured fleet and a non-domestically manufactured fleet, and ensure that each fleet separately meets the CAFE standards for passenger automobiles. The CAFE statute requires NHTSA to grant such a petition unless it finds that doing so would result in reduced employment in the U.S. related to motor vehicle manufacturing. NHTSA’s analysis does not support a finding that granting the petition would reduce automotive manufacturing employment in the United States. Accordingly, in this notice, NHTSA is granting Nissan’s petition. |
Grant of petition for exemption from two-fleet rule | ||
111 |
NPRM to Require a Rear Detection System for Single-Unit Trucks The agency estimates that approximately 79 fatalities per year (13 on-road and 66 off-road) and 148 injuries per year are attributable to straight trucks backing up. The agency believes that requiring a rear detection system will reduce the number of fatalities, injuries, and property damage crashes by giving truck operators the ability to detect objects behind the truck. In this analysis, we examine two possible counter-measures: a cross-view mirror system and a camera system. |
Preliminary Regulatory Evaluation |
NHTSA on the Federal Register
View notices, proposed rules and final rules NHTSA administers. Also respond to requests for comment.