Interpretation ID: NYS_preemption-8263
Ms. Ida L. Traschen, Esq.
Department of Motor Vehicles
6 Empire State Plaza
Albany, NY 12228
Dear Ms. Traschen:
This responds to your letter in which you asked whether New York State "must" amend its definition of low speed vehicle (LSV) to conform to the recent amendment to the Federal definition of LSV. Your question is addressed below.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration established Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 500, Low Speed Vehicles, to ensure that LSVs are equipped with an appropriate level of motor vehicle equipment for the purposes of safety. As established in an August 17, 2005 final rule, LSV is defined as a 4-wheeled motor vehicle with a maximum gross vehicle weight rating less than 1,134 kilograms (2,500 pounds), whose attainable speed in one mile is more than 32 kilometers per hour (km/h) (20 miles per hour (mph)) but less than 40 km/h (25 mph) (70 FR 48313).
While a State is not required to amend its definition of LSV, maintaining a different definition than the Federal definition could have implications with respect to preemption of State laws.
Under Federal law, a vehicle that meets the Federal definition of "low-speed vehicle" must be manufactured to conform to FMVSS No. 500. Similarly, a vehicle that meets the Federal definition of "passenger car," "multipurpose passenger vehicle," or "truck," must be manufactured to meet the FMVSSs applicable to that vehicle type, regardless of how the vehicle may be classified under State law.
Under 49 U.S.C. 30103(b), when a Federal motor vehicle safety standard is in effect, a State or a political subdivision of a State may prescribe or continue in effect a standard applicable to the same aspect of performance of a motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment only if the standard is identical to the standard prescribed under this chapter.
Different motor vehicle safety standards apply depending on how a vehicle is classified, i.e. , its vehicle type. If a State law classifies a vehicle differently than Federal law, preemption is an issue under 49 U.S.C. 30103(b) if: (1) the State classification results in the vehicle being subject to a State standard applicable to the same aspect of performance regulated by a FMVSS, and (2) the State standard is not identical to the FMVSS. In such an instance, the State safety standard would be preempted.
If you have any further questions, please contact Mr. Calamita at (202) 366-2992.
Sincerely,
Stephen P. Wood
Acting Chief Counsel
ref:500
d.1/4/06