ID: nht72-2.21

DATE: 01/17/72

FROM: AUTHOR UNAVAILABLE; R. B. Dyson; NHTSA

TO: Truck Body and Equipment Association, Inc.

TITLE: FMVSS INTERPRETATION

TEXT: This is in reply to your letter of December 21, 1971, to Lawrence R. Schneider requesting an interpretation on the mounting of front identification lamps.

Standard No. 108 requires that identification lamps be mounted "as close as practicable to the top of the vehicle" (Table II). The "vehicle" is the vehicle as completed, and not the incomplete vehicle. Therefore, if the "top" of the vehicle, i.e., the highest point, is a location other than the cab, the identification lamps must be mounted at the "top", and not on the cab, if it is practicable to do so. Generally, manufacturers of van-body vehicles have found it practicable to mount identification lamps on the van body. Modified lighting diagram 0-1 which you enclosed originally depicted the correct location of identification lamps for a truck with a van body.

If the manufacturer of the cab portion of a truck has placed identification lamps on the cab, the lamps need not be removed when the lamps necessary for conformance are added at the "top."

Sincerely,

December 21, 1971 Mr.

Lawrence R. Schneider, Chief Counsel NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION U. S. Department of Transportation

Subject: REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION ON MOUNTING HEIGHT OF FRONT IDENTIFICATION LAMPS.

Re: Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108

The above referenced FMVSS No. 108, becoming effective January 1, 1972, establishes the location and mounting heights of the front identification lamps by stating-----

" . . . as close as practicable to the top of the vehicle . . ."

"On the front only-- and No part of the lamps or mountings shall extend below the top of the vehicle's windshield."

Insofar as trailers are concerned, identification lamps are not required on the front of the trailer. The reasoning for this is that the identification lamps stop the truck tractor will serve the requirement.

We shall use a typical van body truck as an example. (See attached Lighting Diagram O-1.) It is our contention that if identification lamps are mounted on top of chassis-cab vehicles--i.e. incomplete vehicles--as supplied by the chassis manufacturers, it is permissible to leave these lamps in place. We contend that it is not necessary to remove these chassis supplied lamps, nor is it necessary to add an additional set of identification lamps at the top of the body. Of course we realize that if there are not any identification lamps on top of the cab (vehicles 80 or more inches overall width), we would be held responsible to equip the truck with front identification lamps (as close as practicable to the top of the vehicle) as required by FMVSS No. 108.

Please advise us in writing if our interpretations are correct and in full compliance with FMVSS No. 108.

Your earliest response will be appreciated.

Very truly yours,

TRUCK BODY AND EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATION --

Paul A. Tatarski

Manager Engineering Services

Enclosure:

(Graphics omitted)

FOR VEHICLES OF 80 OR MORE INCHES OVERALL WIDTH

RECOMMENDED LAMP AND REFLECTOR LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108

(DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE)

The general areas indicated for lamps and reflectors are acceptable to the U.S. Department of Transportations National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety. Consult Federal MVSS No. 108 and the applicable tables therein for exact requirements such as: mounting height limitations lamp combinations and alternative locations.

LEGEND

1. Headlamps (2)-white (4 optional)

2. Front side-marker lamps (2)-amber

3. Front side reflectors (2)-amber

4. Front turn-signal lamps (2)-amber

4a. Front turn-signal lamps (2)-amber (optional location)

5. Front identification lamps (3)-amber 5a. Front identification lamps (3)-amber (optional location)

6. Front clearance lamps (2)-amber

7. Rear side-marker lamps (2)-amber

8. Rear side reflectors (2)-red

9. Rear identification lamps (3)-red

10. Rear clearance lamps (2)-red

11. Rear reflectors (2)-red

12. Rear stop-tail & turn-signal lamps (2)-red

13. Rear licence plate lamp (1)-white

14. Rear backup lamp (1)-white (location optional provided optical requirements are met)

15. Intermediate side-marker lamps (2)-amber (if vehicle is 30' or more overall length)

16. Intermediate side reflectors (2)-amber (if vehicle is 30' or more overall length)

NOTE

LAMPS AND REFLECTORS MAY BE MOUNTED AT OTHER PRACTICABLE LOCATIONS PROVIDED LOCATION AND VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108 ARE MET.

Lighting Diagram

Supplement 1/1/71

ID: 86-6.9

TYPE: INTERPRETATION-NHTSA

DATE: 12/08/86

FROM: AUTHOR UNAVAILABLE; Erika Z. Jones; NHTSA

TO: Mr. James R. Mitzenberg

TITLE: FMVSS INTERPRETATION

TEXT:

Mr. James R. Mitzenberg Product Safety Engineer The Flexible Corporation 970 Pittsburgh Drive Delaware, OH 13015

Dear Mr. Mitzenberg:

Forgive our delay in replying to your letter of August 21, 1985, asking for an interpretation of Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, with respect to a deceleration warning system you have been asked to install as original equipment on city transit buses However, on the basis of the information you provided Taylor Vinson of this Office in a phone call on August 13, 1986, we have a better understanding of the system described.

The system as described consists of three amber lamps mounted on the vertical centerline below the rear window. They provide a steady-burning light when the ignition is "on," and when the accelerator is released. They are extinguished when the accelerator is depressed. We have concluded that these aspects of the system are not prohibited by paragraph S4.1.3, which you cited, and which forbids the installation of equipment that impairs the effectiveness of the required lighting equipment.

However, there are two further aspects to the system. The amber lights are also extinguished when the brakes are applied and the normal stop lamps are illuminated, but if the brake application continues for at least 3 seconds the amber lamps will flash at a rate of approximately 60 cycles a minute. You have cited paragraph S4.6 of Standard No. 108 which requires all vehicle lights to be steady-burning, except for turn signals and hazard warning signals, and side marker lamps and headlamps that are flashed for signaling purposes. We have interpreted S4.6 as applying to all lighting equipment on non-emergency vehicles, and not just the equipment required by the standard. This means that the deceleration system must be steady-burning in every mode. There is a good reason for this requirement, as simultaneous use of flashing (amber) and steady-burning (red) lamps have the potential for creating confusion in vehicles to the rear of the bus, and impairing the effectiveness of the required stop lamps within the meaning of S4.1.3.

I hope that this answers your questions.

Sincerely,

Erika Z. Jones Chief Counsel

August 21, 1985

Mr. Jeffery R. Miller Office or Chief Counsel National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 400 Seventh Street, S. W. Washington, D. C. 20590

Dear Mr. Miller:

The Flexible Corporation, a manufacturer or city transit buses, has been requested by several city transit authorities to install a rear deceleration warning light system. These customers have demanded factory installation and operational hook-up of this deceleration warning light system. Other bus manufacturers are supplying such systems without question. Due to this, and by our not agreeing to install the system and make it fully operational, we have found ourselves to be at s distinct marketing disadvantage. We are concerned about certifying our vehicle to FMVSS 108 with an OEM installation or this deceleration light system.

The deceleration light system specified for installation on our bus is manufactured by Safety Development Systems, Haines, Oregon and requires installation on the rear centerline of our bus. See Attachment 11 which depicts the proposed installation method. The housing contains three horizontally aligned amber lights. These amber lights would be installed and operated independently from our normal rear lights and reflectors, which are required FMVSS 108 equipment. These three amber lights operate as described below:

A. When the ignition is "on", the amber lights are illuminated, burning.

B. When the accelerator is depressed, the amber lights are extinguished.

C. When the accelerator is released, the amber lights are illuminated, steady burning, and remain illuminated as long as the accelerator is released.

D. When the brake is applied, the amber lights are extinguished and the normal red atop lights are illuminated. If the brake is continually applied /or three seconds or more, the amber deceleration lights will flash (approximately 60 cycles per minute).

E. The normal amber (red color is optional) rear turn signal could then be illuminated simultaneously with the stop lights and the deceleration lights.

Paragraph S4.6 of FMVSS 108 provides that required signaling lamps shall flash when activated and all other lamps shall be steady burning, except that means mar be provided to flash headlights and side marker lights for signaling purposes.

Paragraph S4.1.3 or FMVSS 108 provides that no additional lamp, reflective device, or other motor vehicle equipment shall be installed that impairs the effectiveness or lighting equipment required by this standard.

In order that we may be customer responsive, we request an interpretation from NHTSA concerning any non-compliance with FMVSS 108 on an OEM installation of these deceleration warning lights functioning as described above.

Sincerely,

James R. Mitzenberg Product Safety Engineer

ID: nht95-1.37

TYPE: INTERPRETATION-NHTSA

DATE: January 27, 1995

FROM: Philip R. Recht -- Chief Counsel, NHTSA

TO: Deborah K. Nowak-Vanderhoef -- Attorney, GM

TITLE: NONE

ATTACHMT: Attached to 12/23/94 letter from Deborah K. Nowak-Vanderhoef to Philip R. Recht (OCC 10600)

TEXT: Dear Ms. Nowak-Vanderhoef:

We have received your letter of December 23, 1994, with respect to an alternative to HB3 and HB4 replaceable light sources, and asking for our "guidance as to the most appropriate method for seeking approval of the alternative bulb configurations." Altho ugh your letter is silent on the matter, we understand from Dick Humphrey of your Washington office that GM would like to incorporate the revised light sources in production in the summer of 1995.

You have presented three possible methods for our consideration. The first is to "seek approval" through 49 CFR Part 564. The second is to petition for rulemaking to amend Standard No. 108 to incorporate the revised light sources. The third is to reque st that HB3 and HB4 bulbs be placed in Part 564 with the alternative configurations included on the drawing.

Under the current regulatory scheme for headlamps, there are two regulations that govern the permissibility of replaceable light sources. The first of these, Standard No. 108, prescribes detailed dimensional specifications and performance requirements f or replaceable light sources Types HB1 through HB5. Faced with the possibility of an endless number of new light sources which could not be added to Standard No. 108 without at least two rulemaking notices, NHTSA decided to deregulate the dimensional asp ects of replaceable light sources by establishing Part 564 which sets up an agency procedure for the allowance of new light sources upon receipt of the dimensional information specified in the regulation. However, the new light source must not be interc hangeable with any other replaceable light source, either in Part 564 or Standard No. 108. NHTSA has been petitioned for reconsideration of this restriction but has not yet acted upon it. Further, it can be argued that there is a regulatory inconsisten cy in the different treatment of replaceable light sources, and that NHTSA needs to address this inconsistency.

NHTSA is conscious of the need for regulatory flexibility in both areas and is actively working towards their resolution.

At present, it appears that we could respond positively to petitions for reconsideration of Part 564 by a direct amendment allowing modifications in previous submissions, but we have not completed our examination of the possible safety ramifications of a llowing interchangeability of modified light sources. The inconsistent treatment of light source dimensions can be resolved through transfer of the HB Types to Part 564, but we do not believe that the Administrative Procedure Act permits us to do so with out a formal proposal asking public comment. In the present regulatory climate, we cannot estimate when the appropriate rulemaking notices will appear but GM's letter evidences the need for a less restrictive regulatory scheme, and we are sympathetic to GM's position. It is our best estimate that both final action on Part 564 and that a NPRM on the transfer amendments to Standard No. 108 will have been published by July 1, 1995, but the issuance of a final rule on the transfers may not have occurred a s of that date. I might add that we see no true safety issues presented by the modified light source; the difficulties are all procedural.

For these reasons, GM may wish at this point to petition for rulemaking to add HB3S and HB4S, as you call them, to Standard No. 108. In the less likely event that, during the pendency of the HB3S/HB4S rulemaking, rulemaking is completed to Standard No. 108 that removes the other HB Types and places them in Part 564, HB3S/HB4S could be added to Part 564 as a termination of the rulemaking. If a proposal to amend Standard No. 108 to remove the HB Types has not proceeded to a final rule, HB3S/HB4S could b e added to Standard No. 108 as proposed, which would allow their use in GM's vehicles.

The following scenario is the most likely resolution of GM's problem. Under paragraph 564.5(a), GM is eligible to furnish information on HB3S/HB4S to Part 564 because they do not meet the requirements of S7.7. Since information indicates that they are interchangeable with HB3/HB4, they could not be accepted absent an amendment to Part 564 allowing for changes. Thus, when a response to the petitions for reconsideration of Part 564 is published that allows changes without affecting interchangeability, GM could immediately file HB3S/HB4S information in Part 564 which, upon acceptance, would allow immediate use of the light sources in GM cars. Acceptance would also moot any rulemaking that might then be underway to add HB3S/HB4S to Standard No. 108 pur suant to a GM petition for rulemaking.

You have also suggested that a single new submission to Part 564 could consist of the HB3/HB4 information currently part of Standard No. 108 with the alternative configurations of HB3S/HB4S included on the drawing. Given paragraph S564.5(a)'s specific e xclusion of Standard No. 108 light sources from Part 564, we could not accept for Part 564 a submission that included a light source meeting the requirements of S7.7 of Standard No. 108.

Our rulemaking and legal staff would be willing to talk with you further if you wish.

Sincerely

ID: nht90-2.16

TYPE: Interpretation-NHTSA

DATE: April 12, 1990

FROM: William Waltz -- Wagner Division, Cooper Industries, Inc.

TO: Stephen P. Wood -- Acting Chief Counsel, NHTSA

TITLE: None

ATTACHMT: Attached to letter dated 7-25-90 to W. Waltz from P. J. Rice; signature by S. P. Wood; (A34; Std. 108) TEXT:

Wagner Lighting Division of Cooper Industries would like to petition N.H.T.S.A. for a "Determination of Inconsequentiality" for non-compliance. We have been asked to assemble antique-appearing sealed beam headlamps for Lectric Limited.

Lectric Limited, a small manufacturer of parts geared toward the antique automobile industry, perceived a need among automobile collectors and hobbyists for sealed beam headlight bulbs for their cars which cosmetically appeared to be the same as those which were originally supplied with their vehicles. These authentic styled bulbs would enhance the value of their vehicles and also add valuable points to their scores at various shows.

Most of these same auto enthusiasts are acquiring old bulbs from wrecking yards which in most cases are extremely dim due to their age and the fact that they were built to the J579A spec. These old bulbs are also prone to sudden failure which is of no consequence at a car show; but can be hazardous on the occasional drive that these vehicles are sometimes used for. In spite of these risks, auto enthusiasts search the junk yards for these rare bulbs and use them.

After considering this problem, Lectric Limited requested a license from Fisher Guide Division of General Motors to duplicate their original lens design on October 6, 1987. On November 9, 1988, a license was granted to Lectric Limited to produce these bulbs.

On March 4, 1989, Lectric Limited contracted with Corning Glass to produce the lenses in accordance with J579A spec. It should be pointed out, that at the time the order to produce these lenses was given, the J579A spec was still on the books. However, shortly after Corning manufactured the tooling to produce these lenses the J579A spec was taken out of the book.

After the J579A spec was declared obsolete (approximately May, 1989), Lectric Limited requested that Corning attempt to upgrade the lens designed to meet J579C. This change also added to the cost of the project, but since the J579C spec would produce a superior and safer product it appeared that the added expenditure would be justified.

Corning was successful in modifying the design to meet J579C spec without noticeable change to the outward appearance of the bulbs and thereby still allowing these bulbs to be acceptable to the vast majority of antique auto enthusiasts.

Lectric Limited was not aware, at the time, that the markings 1D1 or 2D1 were a part of the spec and were required to be on the top of each bulb

produced. These markings on the face of each bulb would in effect make them useless to the antique auto enthusiasts. With no alternative, the car hobbyist would continue to purchase the unsafe but cosmetically accurate junk yard bulbs.

Lectric Limited is a small company and this waste of funds invested would be devastating to its financial future. This, in turn, would cause layoffs and a curtailment in new investments and projects.

OPTION #1

Wagner is requesting permission to produce these bulbs to 579A spec which would allow the use of the word TOP on #6012 (7") bulbs, #1 on 4001 (5 3/4") bulbs and #2 on 4002 (5 3/4") bulbs. We would also not be using the D.O.T. identification on the bulbs.

OPTION #2

Wagner would produce these bulbs to meet 579C specs and would use the word TOP on #6014 (7") bulb in place of 2C1, use the #1 designation on the 5001 (5 3/4") bulbs in place of the 1C1 designation and use the #2 designation on the 4000 (5 3/4") bulbs in place of the 2C1 designation. We would also not be using the D.O.T. identification on these bulbs.

ADDENDUM TO OPTION #2

Lectric Limited is willing to ink stamp the 1D1 or 2C1 and DOT designation on either the face and or the rear of each bulb, in order to avoid mistaking these bulbs for J579A spec bulbs.

Lectric Limited would produce an instruction sheet for insertion in each bulb package or print instructions on each box explaining the variations to the end user. This would also help to avoid confusion.

Lectric Limited is also willing to assure that these bulbs will only be marketed through antique auto specialty retailers and not through major chain stores and retail outlets. This, in addition to the added cost of the bulb which will be necessitated by the small production volume, and the need to amortize the tooling cost over a limited run will help to assure that these bulbs will not be in wide use in everyday transportation vehicles.

In short, Lectric Limited is willing to do whatever is necessary to satisfy the NHTSA requirements in order to obtain a reasonable variation to the 579C spec in regard to the 1D1 and 2C1 designation issue.

We believe that this product will, in effect, enhance the safety of antique automotive enthusiasts and a variation should be granted on these grounds as well as the others stated in this request.

ID: aiam3135

Dear Mr. Murakami:#This is in response to your letter of September 14 1979, in which you asked about the applicability of the variable intensity illumination requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 101-80, *Controls and Displays*, to various components in your company's automobiles. You listed and identified these parts in Figure 1 of your letter which I will refer to in answering your questions.#The variable intensity illumination requirements of section 5.3.3 of Safety Standard 101-80 are applicable to (1) 'controls, gauges, and their identification,' and to (2) 'any illumination that is provided in the passenger compartment when and only when the headlights are activated.' As noted in section 5 of Safety Standard 101-80, the location, identification, and illumination requirements are applicable only to passenger cars and other vehicles equipped with any control listed in section 5.1 or in column 1 of Table 1. The term 'gauge' is defined in Section 4 as a 'display that is listed in section 5.1 or in Table 2 and is not a telltale.'#Applying these criteria to the list of automobile components in your letter, I have concluded that none of the listed components, except the ordinary clock and the automatic gear position illumination lamp, are subject to the requirements of Section 5.3.3 of Safety Standard 101-80. Since this result resolves the issues raised in Questions Q2.1 - Q2.5 of your letter, I have not addressed them in this response.#The components identified in your diagram by letters a - h (the room lamp, spot lamp, luggage room lamp, personal lamp, radio, foot lamp, step lamp, and the luggage room lamp for hatchback vehicles) are not subject to the requirements of section 5.3.3. This is because they are not controls listed in section 5.1 or in column 1 of Table 1 of Safety Standard 101-80 and because they do not illuminate the passenger compartment when and only when the headlights are activated. Similarly the glove box lamp and the console box lamp (items i and j) are not subject to section 5.3.3. They are not controls listed in Safety Standard 101-80 and they are not activated when and only when the headlights are activated since their activation requires both opening the box lids and switching on the headlights.#The ignition key illumination lamp (item k), which is not a control listed in Safety Standard 101-80, is activated when the light control switch is turned to the 'small lights only' position (this activates the clearance clamps (sic), identification lamps, and other exterior lamps other than the headlights.) When the switch is turned to the position that activates both, the small lights and the headlights, the key illumination lamp is deactivated. Consequently, the lamp is not activated when and only when the headlights are activated and is, therefore, not subject to the variable intensity illumination requirements.#You noted in conversation with Ms. Debra Weiner of my office that your company uses two types of clocks (item 1 in your letter) in its automobiles. One is an ordinary clock whose face is illuminated when and only when the headlights are activated. The requirements of section 5.3.5 would apply to the illumination of this type of clock.#The other clock used in your company's automobiles is a digital clock with a flourescent (sic) readout which shines with greater intensity during the day and with a lower intensity at night when the headlights are activated. Since this clock is not a control or a display listed in Safety Standard 101-80 and its illumination is not activated when and only when the headlamps are activated, the requirements of section 5.3.3 for continuously variable illumination are not applicable. Section 5.3.3 also provides that light intensity for informational readout systems shall have at least two values. The term 'informational readout systems' which is not defined in Safety Standard 101-80 refers to the term 'informational readout display,' which is defined as 'a display using light-emitting diodes, liquid crystals, or other electro illuminating devices where one or more than one type of information or message may be displayed.' The term 'display' includes only those displays listed in section 5.1 or in column 1 of Table 2 of the standard and these listings do not include a digital clock. Therefore, the digital clock would not be subject to the light intensity requirements for informational readout systems.#The automatic gear position illumination lamp (item m in your letter) is subject to the variable intensity illumination requirements of section 5.3.3. Although it is not a control (see preamble to Safety Standard 101-80, 43 FR 27541, June 26, 1978) this lamp is activated when and only when the headlights are activated.#In Question 2 of your letter, you asked for the definition of the terms 'continuously variable' and 'variable.' The term 'continuously variable' is defined in section 5.3.3(a) and (b) of Safety Standard 101-80. It is followed by a description of the two light intensities which must be provided for informational readout systems. The term 'variable' appears in the next sentence in section 5.3.3 which states that:#>>>'The intensity of any illumination that is provided in the passenger compartment when and only when the headlights are activated *shall also be variable in a manner that complies with this paragraph*. (sic)<<<#The underlined words in the quoted sentence refer to the definition of 'continuously variable' except in the case of informational readout displays where the words refer to illumination of two intensities.#If you have any further questions, I will be happy to answer them.#Sincerely, Frank Berndt, Chief Counsel;

ID: aiam3136

Dear Mr. Murakami:#This is in response to your letter of September 14 1979, in which you asked about the applicability of the variable intensity illumination requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 101-80, *Controls and Displays*, to various components in your company's automobiles. You listed and identified these parts in Figure 1 of your letter which I will refer to in answering your questions.#The variable intensity illumination requirements of section 5.3.3 of Safety Standard 101-80 are applicable to (1) 'controls, gauges, and their identification,' and to (2) 'any illumination that is provided in the passenger compartment when and only when the headlights are activated.' As noted in section 5 of Safety Standard 101-80, the location, identification, and illumination requirements are applicable only to passenger cars and other vehicles equipped with any control listed in section 5.1 or in column 1 of Table 1. The term 'gauge' is defined in Section 4 as a 'display that is listed in section 5.1 or in Table 2 and is not a telltale.'#Applying these criteria to the list of automobile components in your letter, I have concluded that none of the listed components, except the ordinary clock and the automatic gear position illumination lamp, are subject to the requirements of Section 5.3.3 of Safety Standard 101-80. Since this result resolves the issues raised in Questions Q2.1 - Q2.5 of your letter, I have not addressed them in this response.#The components identified in your diagram by letters a - h (the room lamp, spot lamp, luggage room lamp, personal lamp, radio, foot lamp, step lamp, and the luggage room lamp for hatchback vehicles) are not subject to the requirements of section 5.3.3. This is because they are not controls listed in section 5.1 or in column 1 of Table 1 of Safety Standard 101-80 and because they do not illuminate the passenger compartment when and only when the headlights are activated. Similarly the glove box lamp and the console box lamp (items i and j) are not subject to section 5.3.3. They are not controls listed in Safety Standard 101-80 and they are not activated when and only when the headlights are activated since their activation requires both opening the box lids and switching on the headlights.#The ignition key illumination lamp (item k), which is not a control listed in Safety Standard 101-80, is activated when the light control switch is turned to the 'small lights only' position (this activates the clearance clamps (sic), identification lamps, and other exterior lamps other than the headlights.) When the switch is turned to the position that activates both, the small lights and the headlights, the key illumination lamp is deactivated. Consequently, the lamp is not activated when and only when the headlights are activated and is, therefore, not subject to the variable intensity illumination requirements.#You noted in conversation with Ms. Debra Weiner of my office that your company uses two types of clocks (item 1 in your letter) in its automobiles. One is an ordinary clock whose face is illuminated when and only when the headlights are activated. The requirements of section 5.3.5 would apply to the illumination of this type of clock.#The other clock used in your company's automobiles is a digital clock with a flourescent (sic) readout which shines with greater intensity during the day and with a lower intensity at night when the headlights are activated. Since this clock is not a control or a display listed in Safety Standard 101-80 and its illumination is not activated when and only when the headlamps are activated, the requirements of section 5.3.3 for continuously variable illumination are not applicable. Section 5.3.3 also provides that light intensity for informational readout systems shall have at least two values. The term 'informational readout systems' which is not defined in Safety Standard 101-80 refers to the term 'informational readout display,' which is defined as 'a display using light-emitting diodes, liquid crystals, or other electro illuminating devices where one or more than one type of information or message may be displayed.' The term 'display' includes only those displays listed in section 5.1 or in column 1 of Table 2 of the standard and these listings do not include a digital clock. Therefore, the digital clock would not be subject to the light intensity requirements for informational readout systems.#The automatic gear position illumination lamp (item m in your letter) is subject to the variable intensity illumination requirements of section 5.3.3. Although it is not a control (see preamble to Safety Standard 101-80, 43 FR 27541, June 26, 1978) this lamp is activated when and only when the headlights are activated.#In Question 2 of your letter, you asked for the definition of the terms 'continuously variable' and 'variable.' The term 'continuously variable' is defined in section 5.3.3(a) and (b) of Safety Standard 101-80. It is followed by a description of the two light intensities which must be provided for informational readout systems. The term 'variable' appears in the next sentence in section 5.3.3 which states that:#>>>'The intensity of any illumination that is provided in the passenger compartment when and only when the headlights are activated *shall also be variable in a manner that complies with this paragraph*. (sic)<<<#The underlined words in the quoted sentence refer to the definition of 'continuously variable' except in the case of informational readout displays where the words refer to illumination of two intensities.#If you have any further questions, I will be happy to answer them.#Sincerely, Frank Berndt, Chief Counsel;

ID: 1984-3.11

TYPE: INTERPRETATION-NHTSA

DATE: 08/21/84

FROM: AUTHOR UNAVAILABLE; Frank Berndt; NHTSA

TO: Wayne Ivie -- Manager, Support Section, Motor Vehicle Division Department of Transportation (Oregon)

TITLE: FMVSS INTERPRETATION

TEXT: This responds to your letter of July 27, 1984, to Mr. Frank Turpin, which was forwarded to my office for reply, asking several questions concerning our regulations on certain items of motor vehicle equipment. The following discussions answer your questions.

You have asked first if there are any provisions in Standard No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment, for or against the use of blue warning lamps on police vehicles, if the lamps are steady burning rather than rotating. You have been unable to answer this question by referrals either to Standard No. 108 or SAE materials. Because the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act allows States and municipalities to impose higher standards than the Federal ones for vehicles procured for their own use (15 U.S.C. 1392(d)), the agency has generally deferred to the judgment of governmental bodies in their equipment specifications.

You have not stated whether the blue warning lamps would be supplemental to the vehicle's existing lighting, or replacing some item of the vehicle's original equipment. If the lighting is supplemental (e.g., roof-mounted as are the warning lamps on police vehicles in this area), Standard No. 108 permits it if it does not impair the effectiveness of the lighting equipment that is required by the standard (paragraph S4.1.3). Thus, a roof-mounted lamp, whether steady-burning or rotating, would appear permissible. If, however, the warning lamp was adjacent to a stop lamp or headlamp, or replaced a lamp such as a taillamp, a question of impairment could arise, and the burden would be on a State to demonstrate it had adopted a higher standard of performance.

Your second question asked whether there is a specific statement in our regulations or elsewhere which prohibits the attaching of materials to vehicle windshields and windows. The following discussion explains the effect of Standard No. 205, Glazing Materials, and section 108(a)(2) (A) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (the Act) on tinting films and other materials placed on windshields and other windows.

Pursuant to the Act, we have promulgated Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 205, Glazing Materials, which specifies performance and location requirements for glazing used in vehicles. These requirements include specifications for minimum levels of light transmittance (70 percent in areas requisite for driving visibility, which includes all windows in passenger cars) and abrasion resistance. This specification for light transmittance precludes darkly-tinted windows in new automobiles.

Tinting and other films are not glazing materials themselves and would not have to comply with Standard No. 205. However, installation of such films on new motor vehicles would be prohibited if the vehicle glazing no longer complied with the light transmittance or abrasion requirements of the standard.

A vehicle manufacturer or a dealer may place the film on glazing in a new vehicle prior to sale of the vehicle only if that manufacturer or dealer is able to certify that the glazing continues to be in compliance with the requirements of Standard No. 205. Purchasers of a new vehicle may alter the vehicle as they please, so long as they adhere to all State requirements.

However, vehicle owners may not go to a commercial establishment to have darkly tinted films installed for them. Section 108(a)(2)(A) of the Act provides that no manufacturer, distributor, dealer or motor vehicle repair business shall knowingly render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle in compliance with an applicable motor vehicle safety standard. Thus, none of those persons may knowingly install a film on a vehicle for its owner if that act would render inoperative the light transmittance or abrasion resistance of the vehicle glazing. Violation of this section can result in Federal civil penalties up to $ 1,000 for each violation.

You mentioned that you have recently received an inquiry from the U.S. Air Force concerning the placement of identification decals on a vehicle. We have received a similar inquiry and I am enclosing a copy of our response.

If you have any further questions, please let me know.

ENC.

Department of Transportation MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION

July 27, 1984

NHTSA

Attention: Francis J. Turpin

Dear Frank:

We would appreciate your help on some questions we have concerning federal regulations/requirements on certain vehicle equipment items.

1. Are there any provisions for or against use of blue warning lamps on police vehicles, if the lamps are "steady burning" -- non flashing or rotating? We were unable to find any information regarding this in FMVSS 108 or in the SAE Standards covering vehicle lighting.

2. Is there a specific "statement" in the federal regulations or elsewhere that prohibits attaching material to vehicle windshields/windows? Presently it is not allowed by our state laws, if "the material prohibits of impairs the ability to see into or out of the vehicle." The availability of various window tinting materials and screening causes constant inquiries from law enforcement, manufacturing companies, repair shops, and individuals regarding this law. Also, we have recently received inquiries from the U. S. Air Force on placing their Identification Decals on windshields of Air Force personnels' private vehicles.

We respond to the window glazing inquiries with information from FMVSS 205 and ANSI Z26. (Ie, the 70% light transmittance requirements.) Also, we mention Section 108 (2) (A) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, concerning rendering inoperative of vehicle equipment. But, we would like to also be able to provide a definite federal prohibition, with possible penalties, etc.

Thank you for any assistance you can give us.

Wayne Ivie Manager, Support Section

ID: aiam4041

Dear Mr. Moriyoshi: This responds to your letter requesting an interpretation of Federa Motor Vehicle Safety Standards No. 101, *Controls and Displays*, and NO. 102, *Transmissions Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect*. You asked about the identification and visibility requirements of these standards for the gear position indicator of an automatic transmission. As part of a design you are considering producing, a gear position indicator, using light- emitting diodes (LED's), would be located within the instrument panel. Your letter states that this system would conform with all applicable requirements when the ignition switch is in the on and start positions, but would not be visible when the ignition switch was in the accessory or off positions. Your letter states further that, in addition to this LED display, the steering- column-mounted gear shift selector would be provided with embossed position indicators conforming to Standard No. 102, except that the identifiers would only be visible from the inboard side of the steering column and thereby require the driver to lean forward and to the right for visual confirmation of the automatic gear position. The issues raised by your letter with respect to whether the design you are considering would comply with Standard No. 101 and No. 102 are addressed below.; By way of background information, the National Highway Traffic Safet Administration (NHTSA) does not provide approvals of motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment. Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that its vehicles or equipment comply with applicable standards. the following represents our opinion based on the facts provided in your letter.; I will begin by identifying the requirements of Standards No. 101 an No. 102 that are relevant to your request. Section S3.2 of Standard No. 102 states that the '(i)dentification of shift lever positions of automatic transmissions and of the shift lever pattern of manual transmissions . . . shall be *permanently displayed in view of the driver*.' (Emphasis added.); Standard No. 101 specifies requirements for the location identification and illumination of automatic gear position displays. Section S5.1 requires that gear position displays must be visible to the driver under the conditions of section S6. Section S6 provides that the driver is restrained by the crash protection equipment installed in accordance with Standard No. 208, *Occupant Crash Protection*, adjusted in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Section S5.3.1 and Table 2 of the standard together require that automatic gear position displays be illuminated whenever the ignition switch and/or the headlamps are activated. The entry in Table 2 concerning the automatic gear position display reference Standard No. 102.; I will now address these requirements in relation to the design you ar considering. As discussed below, it is our opinion that your proposed design would not meet Standard No. 102's requirement that the identification of shift lever positions of automatic transmissions must be permanently displayed in view of the driver.; While your design would include two automatic gear position displays *neither* display would provide identification of shift lever positions of automatic transmissions in view of the driver when the ignition switch is in the accessory or off position. As noted by your letter, NHTSA has interpreted the words 'permanently displayed' to require a display which can be seen regardless of the operating mode of the engine. The display on the instrument panel would not be visible when the ignition switch is in the accessory or off positions. The other display, located on the steering column, would not be visible to the driver regardless of the position of the ignition switch.; NHTSA has previously addressed Standard No. 102's requirement tha certain identification be 'in view of the driver' in connection with a request for interpretation concerning the identification of the shift lever pattern of manual transmissions. The agency concluded that the pattern 'is deemed to be 'displayed in view of the driver' if part of it may be seen from the driver's normal eye position and a reasonable amount of movement of the driver allows him to gain full view of the pattern.' (Letter to Daimler-Benz of North America, February 27, 1967); As noted above, your letter states that the display on the steerin column would 'only be visible from the side of the steering column and thereby require the driver to lean forward and to the right for visual confirmation of the automatic gear position.' This suggests that little, if any, of the display may be seen from the driver's normal eye position and that a significant amount of movement of the driver would be required to see the full display. This is further confirmed by a statement in your letter indicating that the driver would need to lean forward, utilizing the flexibility provided by an emergency locking retractor, in order to see the display, and then *return* to the normal driving position. (Emphasis added) It therefore appears that the display is not 'in view of the driver.'; While your letter suggest that the degree of visibility provided by th display might be appropriate for situations where the vehicle is not activated, Standard No. 102's requirement that the display be within the ' view of the driver' does not distinguish between whether the engine is on or off. We also note that a driver used to viewing the gear position indicator on the instrument panel might not be aware that another display, which would not be visible from a normal driving position, even exists.; Since neither display would provide identification of shift leve positions of automatic transmissions in view of the driver when the ignition switch is in the accessory or off position, it is unnecessary to address the issue raised by your letter concerning whether multiple and complementary indicator can be used to meet the requirements of Standards No. 101 and No. 102 for gear position displays, where no single indicator meets the requirements.; Sincerely, Erika Z. Jones, Chief Counsel

ID: 06-003601as

ID: 17892-2.ztv

Mr. William A.G. Sanford
Chairman
Metro Motors Corporation
12202 Timber Run Court
Monrovia, MD 21770

Dear Mr. Sanford:

This is in reply to your letters of April 28, 1998, July 3, 1998, and July 27, 1998, seeking an opinion that certain vehicles Metro Motors Corporation ("Metro" hereafter) wishes to import are not "motor vehicles" subject to regulation by this agency. Based on the information provided in your letter, it appears that the vehicles are not motor vehicles under the statutes we administer.

The vehicles in question have the appearance of small passenger-carrying vans and trucks and are manufactured by Asia Motors in Korea. Your letter of April 28, 1998 informed us that the vehicles "will be marketed to industrial equipment distributors (forklift dealers) and professional turf dealers (golf course equipment firms) and specialty houses (industrial sweeper & scrubber dealers)." Your letter of July 27, 1998 indicated that the passenger vans would primarily be used on "closed" college/university campuses. Product literature contains the warning "These vehicles are intended for off-road use only." The Certificate of Origin states that the vehicles do "not conform to all safety and emissions standards applicable to on road vehicles in the United States." Metro intends to affix to the vehicles a yellow placard (4 inches by 14 inches) with the same advisories and warnings as the literature, placard, and Certificate of Origin. Finally, the engine and transmissions of the vehicles will be modified to restrict the top speed to not more than 25 miles per hour.

Your letter of July 3, 1998, advises that the vehicles are equipped with headlamps, parking lamps, backup lamps, turn signal /hazard warning signal lamps, combination stop/taillamps, all of which comply with "federal DOT regulations for ON ROAD vehicles." Shoulder and lap belts "are standard on all models." Dual side mirrors and an interior mirror are also standard. The vehicles are equipped with four-wheel hydraulic brakes, radial tires, and "safety" glass. You also list a number of comfort and convenience items with which the vehicles are equipped. You have attached a certificate from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency which approves Metro's importation of "motorized units." Finally, you have enclosed a Vehicle Emissions Inspection Certificate issued to one of the vehicles.

A "motor vehicle" for purposes of compliance with the Federal motor vehicle safety program is, in pertinent part, a vehicle that is "manufactured primarily for use on the public streets, roads, and highways." 49 U.S.C. 30102(a)(6). The issue raised by your letter is whether the vehicle you would be importing would be considered a motor vehicle under the statutes we administer.

I note that the factual situation you raise is similar to one we addressed in an October 31, 1988 letter to MMC Services concerning the Mitsubishi Motors Corporation SH27 lightweight industrial truck. As was the case in that situation, your vehicles are not easily classified. On the one hand, the vehicles have a body configuration nearly identical to standard trucks and vans and can reach a speed of 25 miles per hour. These factors suggest that the vehicles should be classified as motor vehicles. On the other hand, you stated that the vehicles are intended to be used only for off-road applications and that the vehicle will be advertised and promoted for off-road purposes only and will contain two placards stating "Warning: this vehicle is for off-use only. The use of this vehicle is not intended for on-road use, and it does not meet USDOT regulations for on-road usage. IT IS ILLEGAL FOR USE AS A LICENSABLE VEHICLE!" These factors suggest that the vehicle should not be classified as a motor vehicle.

In instances where the agency is asked whether a vehicle is a motor vehicle when it has both off-road and on-road operating capabilities, and about which there is little or no evidence about the extent of the vehicle's on-road use, the agency has applied five factors in offering its advice. These factors are:

1. Whether the vehicle will be advertised for use on-road as well as off-road, or whether it will be advertised exclusively for off-road use.

You stated that your product literature contains an advisory that the vehicles are for off-road use only. This factor suggests that the vehicles should not be considered motor vehicles.

2. Whether the vehicle's manufacturer or dealers will assist vehicle purchasers in obtaining certificates of origin or title documents to register the vehicle for on-road use.

The sample certificate of origin you enclosed in your letter states "THIS VEHICLE DOES NOT CONFORM TO ALL SAFETY AND EMISSIONS STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ON-ROAD VEHICLES IN THE UNITED STATES." Therefore, this factor would indicate that the vehicles should not be considered motor vehicles.

3. Whether the vehicle is or will be sold by dealers also selling vehicles that are classified as motor vehicles.

As noted previously, you have informed us that the vehicles "will be marketed to industrial equipment distributors (forklift dealers) and professional turf dealers (golf course equipment firms) and specialty houses (industrial sweeper & scrubber dealers)." The vehicles sold by these dealers are not motor vehicles. This factor suggests that the vehicles should not be considered motor vehicles.

4. Whether the vehicle has or will have affixed to it a warning label stating that the vehicle is not intended for use on the public roads.

As noted above, two warning placards will be affixed to the exterior of the vehicle body. This factor would indicate that the vehicles are not motor vehicles.

5. Whether states or foreign countries have permitted or are likely to permit the vehicle to be registered for on-road use.

Since the vehicles closely resemble small trucks and vans used on the public roads, it is possible that states would permit them to be registered for highway use. In fact, the State of Maryland has issued an emissions approval certificate for one of the vehicles. Therefore, this factor suggests that the vehicles should be considered motor vehicles.

Based on the representations in your letter and considering all of the five factors discussed above, on balance, we believe that your vehicles are not "motor vehicles." However, we will reexamine this conclusion if we learn that, for example, the vehicles are in fact used on the public roads by a substantial number of owners.

If you have any questions, you may contact Taylor Vinson of this Office (202-366-5263).

Sincerely,
Frank Seales, Jr.
Chief Counsel
ref:571#591
d.1/25/99