Skip to main content
Search Interpretations

Interpretation ID: nht94-4.33

TYPE: INTERPRETATION-NHTSA

DATE: September 20, 1994

FROM: Ed Irvine -- Midwest Conservation Systems, Inc.

TO: Phillip Recht -- Chief Counsel, NHTSA

TITLE: NONE

ATTACHMT: Attached to 1/11/95 letter from Philip R. Recht to Ed Irvine (A43; Std. 121)

TEXT: IS IT A REQUIREMENT OF COMMERCIAL UTILITY TRAILERS, THAT FOR EXAMPLE MAY HAVE A BACKHOE TRACTOR, LEAVE THE NEW TRAILER MANUFACTURER WITH A EMERGENCY BREAKAWAY SYSTEM? (SECTION [ILLEGIBLE WORD]) WE HAVE A CORPORATE CUSTOMER WHO IS PURCHASING NEW TRAILERS FROM A MANUFACTURER THAT CLAIMS THEY MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH THEIR BREAKAWAY SYSTEM WHICH IS BASICALLY ONLY A BATTERY IN A BOX. MOST GENERALLY THIS TYPE OF SYSTEM IS NOT CHECKED BY THE OPERATOR AND MOST GENERALLY DEAD WHEN [ILLEGIBLE WORD]. THE CORPORAT E CUSTOMER WOULD LIKE TO BUY THE TRAILERS WITH OUT THEIR BREAKAWAY SYSTEM SO THEY CAN OUTFIT THE TRAILERS WITH OUR SOLAR ENERGIZED BREAKAWAY SYSTEMS. THANKS! ED

Enclosure (Brochure omitted.)

Go to top of page