Skip to main content
Search Interpretations

Interpretation ID: aiam3156

Honorable S. I. Hayakawa, United States Senate, Washington, DC 20510; Honorable S. I. Hayakawa
United States Senate
Washington
DC 20510;

Dear Senator Hayakawa: This responds to your October 25, 1979, letter enclosing correspondenc from your constituent Mr. Morrill N. Farr asking about the agency's air brake standard. Mr. Farr also asked about the highway use tax. We understand that the Federal Highway Administration will respond to you directly with an answer to that question.; With respect to the air brake standard, Mr. Farr asked whether th Government would reimburse him for a portion of the costs of installing the no lockup portion of his air brake system. Mr. Farr stated that a court has held the no lockup requirement of the air brake standard invalid, and accordingly, the Government should reimburse vehicle owners for the installation of no lockup systems that have been proven to be faulty.; The court in *PACCAR v. The National Highway Traffic Safet Administration*, 573 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1978) *cert. den'd* 439 U.S. 862 (October 2, 1978), stated that the no lockup portions of the standard were invalid because some of the systems constructed in accordance with the requirements were unreliable. The court also indicated that a proper no lockup device could substantially improve the safety of vehicles. Our air brake standard does not specify a particular design or construction of brake system. It is a performance standard, and manufacturers are free to choose any design or construction that complies with the performance requirements. The fact that some manufacturers chose faulty systems is unfortunate. If the system on Mr. Farr's truck is faulty, his remedy lies with the manufacturers of the truck and the system, not with the Government.; This agency has attempted over the past several years to address th problem of faulty systems by initiating several investigations under the statutory provisions requiring manufacturers to recall and remedy defective vehicles and equipment. Those investigations contributed to the decisions of a number of manufacturers to conduct recalls.; Sincerely, Frank Berndt, Chief Counsel