NHTSA Interpretation File Search
Overview
NHTSA's Chief Counsel interprets the statutes that the agency administers and the standards and regulations that it issues. Members of the public may submit requests for interpretation, and the Chief Counsel will respond with a letter of interpretation. These interpretation letters look at the particular facts presented in the question and explain the agency’s opinion on how the law applies given those facts. These letters of interpretation are guidance documents. They do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. They are intended only to provide information to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
Understanding NHTSA’s Online Interpretation Files
NHTSA makes its letters of interpretation available to the public on this webpage.
An interpretation letter represents the opinion of the Chief Counsel based on the facts of individual cases at the time the letter was written. While these letters may be helpful in determining how the agency might answer a question that another person has if that question is similar to a previously considered question, do not assume that a prior interpretation will necessarily apply to your situation.
- Your facts may be sufficiently different from those presented in prior interpretations, such that the agency's answer to you might be different from the answer in the prior interpretation letter;
- Your situation may be completely new to the agency and not addressed in an existing interpretation letter;
- The agency's safety standards or regulations may have changed since the prior interpretation letter was written so that the agency's prior interpretation no longer applies; or
- Some combination of the above, or other, factors.
Searching NHTSA’s Online Interpretation Files
Before beginning a search, it’s important to understand how this online search works. Below we provide some examples of searches you can run. In some cases, the search results may include words similar to what you searched because it utilizes a fuzzy search algorithm.
Single word search
Example: car
Result: Any document containing that word.
Multiple word search
Example: car seat requirements
Result: Any document containing any of these words.
Connector word search
Example: car AND seat AND requirements
Result: Any document containing all of these words.
Note: Search operators such as AND or OR must be in all capital letters.
Phrase in double quotes
Example: "headlamp function"
Result: Any document with that phrase.
Conjunctive search
Example: functionally AND minima
Result: Any document with both of those words.
Wildcard
Example: headl*
Result: Any document with a word beginning with those letters (e.g., headlamp, headlight, headlamps).
Example: no*compl*
Result: Any document beginning with the letters “no” followed by the letters “compl” (e.g., noncompliance, non-complying).
Not
Example: headlamp NOT crash
Result: Any document containing the word “headlamp” and not the word “crash.”
Complex searches
You can combine search operators to write more targeted searches.
Note: The database does not currently support phrase searches with wildcards (e.g., “make* inoperative”).
Example: Headl* AND (supplement* OR auxiliary OR impair*)
Result: Any document containing words that are variants of “headlamp” (headlamp, headlights, etc.) and also containing a variant of “supplement” (supplement, supplemental, etc.) or “impair” (impair, impairment, etc.) or the word “auxiliary.”
Search Tool
NHTSA's Interpretation Files Search
| Interpretations | Date |
|---|---|
ID: 23667.drnOpen Mr. Mike J. Gower Dear Mr. Gower: This responds to your request for an interpretation of the correct "seating reference point" to use for a designated seating position when applying Standard No. 104, Windshield wiping and washing systems, to passenger cars. You ask whether the seating reference point is "that point which is in the rearmost position of the total seat travel and if the total seat movement envelope is trapezoidal in side view . . ., that this required point would also be the lowest?" Until April 8, 1993, the rearmost position of the driver's seat was required to be used for the determination of wiped areas A, B, and C in Standard No. 104. However, as explained below, this was changed by a 1993 final rule (44 FR 13021). S4.1.2 of Standard No. 104 specifies the area of the windshield that must be wiped by the vehicle's windshield wiping system. Paragraph S4.1.2.1 of the standard refers to SAE Recommended Practice J903a, May 1966, Passenger Car Windshield Wiper Systems. SAE J903a, paragraph 2.4(a), states that the wiped area on the windshield glazing surface is "defined and qualified" by the driver's seat in the rearmost position. It also states, "see Figure 1," which identifies "manikin H point with seat in rearmost position." Nonetheless, a March 9, 1993 final rule (copy enclosed), amended S3 of Standard No. 104 to substitute the term "seating reference point" for the term "manikin H point with seat in rearmost position." Specifically, S3 was amended to state: "The term seating reference point is substituted for the terms manikin H point with seat in the rearmost position and H point wherever any of these terms appear in any SAE Standard or SAE Recommended Practice referred to in this standard." Therefore, the term "seating reference point" replaces "manikin H point with seat in rearmost position" in Figure 1 of SAE J903a. Definitions for terms used in the Federal motor vehicle safety standards (one of which is Standard No. 104) are at 49 CFR 571.3, Definitions. "Seating reference point" (SgRP) is defined as: the unique design H-point, as defined in SAE J1100 (June 1984), which (a) Establishes the rearmost normal design driving or riding position of each designated seating position, which includes consideration of all modes of adjustment, horizontal, vertical, and tilt, in a vehicle; (b) Has X, Y and Z coordinates, as defined in SAE J1100 (June 1984), established relative to the designed vehicle structure; (c) Simulates the position of the pivot center of the human torso and thigh; and (d) Is the reference point employed to position the two-dimensional drafting template with the 95th percentile leg described in SAE J826 (May 1987), or, if the drafting template with the 95th percentile leg cannot be positioned in the seating position, is located with the seat in its most rearward adjustment position. The "Seating reference point" is not necessarily determined with the driver seat in its rearmost adjustment position. Instead, the SgRP may be located where the SAE J826 two-dimensional drafting template using a leg segment representative of a 95th percentile adult male is positioned. If a seat is provided with adjustment positions to accommodate persons larger than the 95th percentile adult male, any such adjustment positions would not affect the location of the SgRP. On the other hand, if the drafting template with the 95th percentile leg could not be positioned in the seat because its rearmost adjustment is too far forward, the SgRP must be located with the seat in its most rearward adjustment position. You could continue to use the rearmost position of the driver's seat in determining the wiped areas in Standard No. 104, although those areas may be slightly greater than if you used the seating reference point as interpreted above. This conservative approach could provide a margin of compliance to ensure that all vehicles produced will meet the Standard's requirements. You also asked whether the seating reference point was determined with the seat in its lowest adjustment point. SAE Jll00, June 1984, Motor Vehicle Dimensions (referenced above), paragraph 2.1, explains adjustments of the front seat position other than its rearmost normal driving position. It states that all other adjustable features, such as an adjustable steering wheel, and adjustable seat height, etc., shall be positioned in their normal driving position as specified by the manufacturer. Although a motor vehicle manufacturer may specify any seat height that would also be consistent with the fore-aft procedure for the seating reference point described above, you could use a variety of positions (full up, mid, full down, etc.) to determine the worst case (largest areas) for an additional margin of compliance. I hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions, please contact Ms. Dorothy Nakama this address or at (202) 366-2992. Sincerely, John Womack Enclosure |
2002 |
ID: 24545.drnOpenMs. Doris Schaller-Schnedl Dear Ms. Schaller-Schnedl: This responds to your June 7, 2002, letter asking whether the Federal motor vehicle safety standards have definitions that are similar to those of the EEC for H-point and R-Point. You provided the following EEC definitions of H-point and R-point: H-point means the pivot center of the torso and thigh of the 3 DH machine installed in the vehicle seat []. The 'H' point is located in the center of the centerline of the device which is between the 'H' point sight buttons on either side of the 3 DH machine. The 'H' point corresponds theoretically to the 'R' point. R-point means a design point defined by the vehicle manufacturer for each seating position and established with respect to the three-dimensional reference system. For purposes of our safety standards, 49 CFR 571.3, Definitions, includes a definition for "H point," but not for "R-point." However, 571.3 defines "seating reference point," which is similar in some respects to the "R-point." "H point" is defined in 571.3 as: the mechanically hinged hip point of a manikin which simulates the actual pivot center of the human torso and thigh, described in SAE Recommended Practice J826, "Manikins for Use in Defining Vehicle Seating Accommodations," November 1962. "Seating reference point" (SgRP) is defined in 571.3 as: the unique design H-point, as defined in SAE J1100 (June 1984), which: (a) Establishes the rearmost normal design driving or riding position of each designated seating position, which includes consideration of all modes of adjustment, horizontal, vertical, and tilt, in a vehicle; (b) Has X, Y, and Z coordinates, as defined in SAE J1100 (June 1984), established relative to the designed vehicle structure; (c) Simulates the position of the pivot center of the human torso and thigh; and (d) Is the reference point employed to position the two-dimensional drafting template with the 95th percentile leg described in SAE J826 (May 1987), or, if the drafting template with the 95th percentile leg cannot be positioned in the seating position, is located with the seat in its most rearward adjustment position. The H point and mostly SgRP are used in the test procedures of a number of NHTSA standards. They include: Standard No. 104, Windshield wiping and washing systems; Standard No. 201, Occupant protection in interior impact; Standard No. 202, Head restraints; Standard No. 207, Seating systems; Standard No. 208, Occupant crash protection; Standard No. 210, Seat belt assembly anchorages; Standard No. 213, Child restraint systems; and Standard No. 214, Side impact protection. For your information, we have enclosed a copy of a January 9, 2002, letter to Mr. Mike J. Gower of Trico Products (Europe) Ltd., which discusses a 1993 rulemaking that replaced a reference to "manikin H point with seat in rearmost position" in Standard No. 104 with a reference to "seating reference point." You also ask whether there is a requirement in the safety standards similar to that in the European Standards that, "the H-point has to lie within a certain distance from the R-point. (Square of 50 mm, 74/60/EEC)." While it is difficult to find a directly comparable requirement in the Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSSs) cited above, we believe Standard No. 208 comes close to it in the requirement of the "H" point location when positioning the 50th percentile dummy. You can find further details on the use of the "H" point and the "SgRP" in the FMVSSs by referring to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 49 CFR Part 571. Those without a hard copy of the CFR may access them in electronic form at www.access.gpo.gov/nara. I hope this information is helpful. If you need further assistance, please contact Dorothy Nakama of my staff at this address or at (202) 366-2992. Sincerely, Jacqueline Glassman Enclosure
|
2002 |
ID: 09-002613 BMW positioning the seatOpenDr. Jan Urbahn BMW Group P.O. Box 1227 Westwood, NJ 07675-1227 Dear Dr. Urbahn: This responds to your inquiry about Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 214, Side impact protection, particularly regarding the standards procedure for positioning the drivers seat for the upgraded moving deformable barrier (MDB) test and the pole test. Your original letter, dated April 28, 2008, was withdrawn by you and later resubmitted, unchanged from the original, on April 29, 2009, in a meeting between Martin Rapaport and Alissa Moulton of BMW and agency staff.[1] Mr. Rapaport also emailed us slides on June 3, 2009, that he had brought to the meeting. Background The seat positioning procedure you ask about was adopted by a September 11, 2007, final rule[2] and applies to vehicles on a phased-in schedule beginning with vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2010. The seat positioning procedure is set forth in S8.3 for the MDB test and in S10.3 for the pole test. The procedure specifies how the vehicle seat is positioned in these crash tests with regard to an adjustable seat back, head restraint, lumbar support and any other adjustable part of the seat. The procedure specifies how the vehicle seat is positioned with regard to the seat cushions fore and aft location,[3] angle, and height. Simply stated, the seat positioning procedure describes the following (S8.3.1)[4]: --lumbar support are in the lowest, retracted or deflated position (S8.3.1.1) and other adjustable parts of the seat that provide additional support are in the lowest or non-deployed adjustment position (S8.3.1.2); --head restraints are in the highest and most forward position, and adjustable seat backs are in the manufacturers nominal design riding position (S8.3.1.2); and, --the seat is positioned as follows (S8.3.1.3): -using specified controls, move the seat to its rearmost position (S8.3.1.3.1); -using specified controls, determine the full range of angles of the seat cushion reference line (SCRL). Set the SCRL to the middle of the angular range (the SCRL angle)(S8.3.1.3.1); -maintain the SCRL angle and without using fore and aft control(s), place the cushion to its lowest position (S8.3.1.3.1); -using only the control that primarily moves the seat fore and aft, move the seat to the mid-travel position (S8.3.1.3.2); and, -maintain the SCRL angle and without using the fore and aft control(s), set the height of the seat cushion to the lowest height (S8.3.1.3.3). Discussion You ask twelve questions about the seat positioning procedure. Questions 1 and 2 (Q1 and Q2) and five (Q5) ask whether the specifications of S8.3 and S10.3 need to be followed in the exact sequence as they are described in the standard, particularly with respect to placement of the head restraints and adjustable seat backs, and the closing of convertible tops. You state that due to the kinematics of the seat adjustment, the sequence of the different steps has a significant influence on the final seat position. You provide as an example that if the head restraint were in its highest position, there could be a collision between the head restraint and the roof liner, which could prevent the seat from achieving the specified seat cushion angle. Conversely, you indicate that if the head restraint were raised after the seat is positioned, the seat cushion angle specified by the standard could be achieved. Our answer is as follows. It is very important to follow the seat positioning procedure of S8.3.1.3 in the exact sequence described. This is needed to standardize the fore-aft placement, cushion angle, and height. However, the steps described in S8.3.1.1 and S8.3.1.2 for positioning the lumbar supports and other adjustable parts of the seat, the head restraints, and the adjustable seat backs may be deferred until later in the adjustment process if interference of the seat back and head restraint with vehicle components prevents determination of the full range of the SCRL angle or fore and aft seat travel. Thus, the head restraint may be placed in the lowest position while the seat is adjusted and moved to the highest and full forward position after the seat cushion reference point is set to its lowest position (S8.3.1.3.3), as you suggest in your letter. Similarly, the seat back may be placed at the manufacturers nominal design riding position (S8.3.1.2) after completion of the procedure described in S8.3.1.3.3. You note in your letter that S8.6 of the standard specifies that convertible tops are in the closed position and ask whether the top is closed during the seat positioning procedure. You indicate that if the convertible top were closed during the positioning of the seat, there could be interference between the head restraint and the roof liner, whereas if it were closed after the seat is positioned, the seat cushion angle specified by the standard could be achieved. S8 of FMVSS No. 214 specifies the test conditions for the MDB test. For the test, the convertible top is in the closed position. However, for the pre-test set up, the top may be open to facilitate the positioning of the seats, placement of the test dummies, installation of test equipment, etc. Your third question asks about a thigh support provided by the Z4 seat and whether it would be positioned in the lowest (or non-deployed) position. The agency addressed a similar issue in an interpretation letter to Chris Tinto, dated August 27, 2004 (copy enclosed). The main portion of the seat cushion would be adjusted to the required height position using the seat cushion reference line angle as the primary control parameter. Other adjustments such as an extendable seat cushion leading edge would be treated as additional support and would be adjusted to the lowest or non-deployed position. Questions six (Q6) through twelve relate to the procedure in S8.3.1.3 for positioning the vehicle seats fore and aft location, height, and horizontal angle. You state your understanding of the procedure and ask if you are correct. We believe some of your statements, such as those in Q6 and Q7, indicate some confusion. We trust you have a better understanding of the procedure now, in light of our discussion in the background section, and will write back if you still have questions. Q8 asks about S8.3.1.3.1, which states, among other things, Using any part of any control, other than those just used, determine the full range of angles of the seat cushion reference line and set the seat cushion to reference line to the middle of the angular range. You ask if it is correct that for seats that are equipped with a height adjustment but do not offer a separate seat cushion angle adjustment, that this would determine the height position that they have to be adjusted to (namely the height position where the seat cushion reference line reaches its mid position)? It might be helpful to keep in mind that the procedure of S8.3.1.3 gives priority to the SCRL angle above other factors. We adjust the seat fore-aft in the vehicle and adjust the seat height, as specified in S8.3.1.3 to the extent the SCRL angle can be maintained. That said, assuming we understand your question, our answer is the seat is adjusted to the SCRL angle, and the height range of the seat cushion reference point (SCRP) that allows the SCRL to maintain the mid-angle setting is used to determine SCRP height. We hope this information answers your questions. Please contact Ms. Fujita of my staff at 202-366-2992 if you have any further questions. Sincerely yours, Stephen P. Wood Acting Chief Counsel Enclosure ref:214 d.7/24/09 [1] Attending from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) were Charlie Case, Brian Smith, Larry Valvo and James Jones of the Enforcement Office, Chris Wiacek from Rulemaking, and Deirdre Fujita from Chief Counsel. In the meeting, attendees examined a model year 2009 BMW Z4 that your associates brought to the Department of Transportation building to illustrate your questions. It was also determined that you are withdrawing the questions raised in the last paragraph of your letter. [2] 72 FR 51908, Docket No. NHTSA-29134, amended June 9, 2008, 73 FR 32473, Docket 2008-0104. There are pending petitions for reconsideration that the agency will address. [3] When the 50th percentile adult male ES-2re test dummy is placed in the seat, the seat is in the mid-travel position. When the 5th percentile adult female SID-IIs test dummy is placed in the seat, the seat is in the full forward position. [4] Comparable provisions are set forth in S10.3, but the seat is set to the full forward position when positioned to accommodate the SID-IIs test dummy (S10.3.2.3.2) and at the mid-point height (S10.3.2.3.3). |
2009 |
ID: Std. No. 202(a)OpenKenneth N. Weinstein, Esq. Mayer Brown LLP 1999 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-1101 Dear Mr. Weinstein: This responds to your request for an interpretation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 202a, Head Restraints. You asked about how vehicles are tested to the rear seat dimensional and static performance requirements of S4.2 in situations where, as a result of limited rear seat legroom, the front seat structure interferes with the positioning of the legs of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J826 manikin even when the front seat is in its full-forward position. As discussed below, and consistent with your expressed understanding, the front seat would be removed in such a situation to permit proper positioning of the SAE J826 manikin. As you note in your letter, S5.2 of FMVSS No. 202a states that, as part of the dimensional and static performance procedures, the SAE J826 (July 1995) manikin is positioned according to the seating procedure found in SAE J826 (July 1995). Section 6 of SAE J826 (July 1995), titled Second Seat Installation Procedure for Short-Coupled Vehicles, cites special procedures for situations where the leg interferes with the front seat back when the front seat is in the rearmost normal driving and riding position. These procedures are set forth in Appendix A, which provides two alternative methods. One of the methods includes the language Move the front seat forward out of the way. The other includes the language Move the front seat forward as indicated on the seating arrangement drawing; or the amount required to clear the foot and leg assembly and, later in the procedure, if there is interference from the front seat back to the knee and/or leg clearance, the language: move the front seat forward as much as may be necessary (one seat adjuster position at a time) repositioning the feet under the front seat cushion frame. You state that although neither of the methods in Appendix A explicitly authorizes the removal of the front seat, it appears that such removal is implicitly authorized by Method A, which states: move the front seat forward out of the way. You also argue that if the standard were interpreted so as to not permit the removal of the front seat, there are vehicles whose rear seats could not be tested for compliance with S4.2, since the manikin could not be properly positioned in the rear seat. After considering the language of S5.2 and SAE J826 (1995), and also the purposes of the rear seat dimensional and static performance requirements, it is our opinion that in a situation where, as a result of limited rear seat legroom, the front seat structure interferes with the positioning of the legs of the SAE J826 manikin even when the front seat is in its full-forward position, the front seat is removed for purposes of testing to those requirements. The basic approach of the relevant seating procedure in SAE J826 (July 1995) is to move the front seat to avoid interfering with the positioning of the manikin in the rear seat. The removal of the front seat in the situation described above is a continuation of that approach to avoid such interference, and thereby permits proper positioning of the SAE J826 manikin. We note that since this interpretation reflects consideration of the specific language and purposes of the relevant portions of FMVSS No. 202a, it should not be read as necessarily applying in other contexts. I hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, please contact Edward Glancy of my staff at (202) 366-2992.
Sincerely,
O. Kevin Vincent Chief Counsel
Ref: Standard No. 202(a) Dated: 5/18/2012 |
2012 |
ID: aiam4573OpenMs. Theresa Rooney Alpine Electronics of America, Inc. l00 North Centre Avenue Rockville Centre, NY ll570; Ms. Theresa Rooney Alpine Electronics of America Inc. l00 North Centre Avenue Rockville Centre NY ll570; "Dear Ms. Rooney: This responds to your letter requesting a interpretation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. l0l, Controls and Displays. We apologize for the delay in our response. You stated that it is your understanding that any car sound system which is factory installed must have light intensities that have two values, a higher one for day and a lower one for night, that these two light intensities do not have to be variable, and that any color may be used to illuminate the system. You asked for confirmation of this understanding. As discussed below, Standard No. l0l's requirements in this area are somewhat more flexible than suggested by your letter. By way of background information, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does not provide approvals of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment. Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that its motor vehicles or equipment comply with applicable safety standards. The following represents our opinion based on the facts provided in your letter. The requirements of Standard No. l0l that are relevant to car sound systems are set forth in section S5.3.5. That section states: S5.3.5 Any source of illumination within the passenger compartment which is forward of a transverse vertical plane 4.35 inch (ll0.6 mm) rearward of the manikin 'H' point with the driver's seat in its rearmost driving position, which is not used for the controls and displays regulated by this standard, which is not a telltale, and which is capable of being illuminated while the vehicle is in motion, shall have either (l) light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness, (2) a single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions, or (3) a means of being turned off. This requirement does not apply to buses that are normally operated with the passenger compartment illuminated. With respect to car sound systems, section S5.3.5's requirements can be summarized as follows. First, the requirements generally apply to any car sound system that is installed in a motor vehicle before its first sale to a consumer and that includes a source of illumination which is forward of the driver. Second, the section requires that any such source of illumination have either (l) light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness, (2) a single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions, or (3) a means of being turned off. No color requirements are specified for the source of illumination of a car sound system. I would note that, at the option of the manufacturer, motor vehicles manufactured before September l, l989, may comply with the requirements of Standard No. l00 instead of the requirements of Standard No. l0l. This provision is of relevance for some, but not all, car sound systems, and only for vehicles manufactured before September l, l989. If you desire further information about this provision, please contact us. Sincerely, Erika Z. Jones Chief Counsel"; |
|
ID: aiam4649OpenMr. Jim Bowen Vice President of Quality, Service and Parts Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. P.O. Box l005 Nappanee, IN 46550; Mr. Jim Bowen Vice President of Quality Service and Parts Gulf Stream Coach Inc. P.O. Box l005 Nappanee IN 46550; "Dear Mr. Bowen: This responds to your letter concerning th installation of a television receiver in view of the driver of a vehicle. You asked whether the television is required to be off, when the ignition switch is turned on. I regret the delay in responding. Your question is responded to below. By way of background information, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) does not provide approvals of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment. Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that its vehicles and equipment meet applicable standards. The following represents our opinion based on the facts provided in your letter. I have enclosed a copy of a June 4, l987 letter, addressed to Panasonic, which discusses a number of issues relating to the installation of television receivers in motor vehicles. The letter notes that NHTSA does not have any safety standards specifically covering television receivers. The letter also explains that is possible that the installation of a television receiver could affect the compliance of a vehicle with some safety standards. With respect to your specific question concerning whether a television receiver installed in view of the driver of a vehicle is required to be off when the ignition is turned on, I would like to draw your attention to one requirement of Standard No. l0l, Controls and Displays. Section S5.3.5 of that standard reads as follows: Any source of illumination within the passenger compartment which is forward of a transverse vertical plane 4.35 inch (ll0.6 mm) rearward of the manikin 'H' point with the driver's seat in its rearmost driving position, which is not used for the controls and displays regulated by this standard, which is not a telltale, and which is capable of being illuminated while the vehicle is in motion, shall have either (l) light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness, (2) a single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions, or (3) a means of being turned off. This requirement does not apply to buses that are normally operated with the passenger compartment illuminated. The purpose of this requirement is to prevent glare visible to the driver. If a television receiver installed in view of the driver is capable of operation while the vehicle is in motion, it would be subject to this requirement. While NHTSA does not have any safety standards specifically covering television receivers, the installation of a television receiver in view of the driver which is capable of operation while the vehicle is in motion would raise obvious safety concerns related to possible driver distraction. If you are considering such installation, we recommend that you carefully evaluate the safety implications of such action. Finally, I note that state laws may cover the installation of television receivers in motor vehicles. The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators may be able to provide information on that issue. Its address is: 4200 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Sincerely, Stephen P. Wood Acting Chief Counsel"; |
|
ID: aiam4440OpenMr. Koji Tokunaga Manager, Engineering Isuzu Motors America, Inc. 2l4l5 Civic Center Drive Southfield, MI 48076-3969; Mr. Koji Tokunaga Manager Engineering Isuzu Motors America Inc. 2l4l5 Civic Center Drive Southfield MI 48076-3969; "Dear Mr. Tokunaga: This responds to your letter asking about Federa Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. l0l, Controls and Displays, as amended by a final rule published in the FEDERAL REGISTER (52 FR 3244) on February 3, l987. We apologize for the delay in our response. You described a proposed design for a radio and asked whether the requirements of section S5.3.5 would apply to the source of illumination for the radio and, if so, whether your design would meet those requirements. The following represents our opinion based on the facts provided in your letter. As discussed below, the requirements of section S5.3.5 would apply to the source of illumination for your planned radio. Your current design would meet the requirements of that section. You described your planned radio as follows: In the case of the radio to be installed on our vehicle, radio display is automatically illuminated when radio switch is turned 'on.' Likewise, when the switch is turned 'off,' this display is automatically extinguished. This illumination is a single intensity, but the intensity is not 'barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions.' The current language of section S5.3.5, which reflects an amendment made by a final rule published in the FEDERAL REGISTER (52 FR 334l6) on September 3, l987, is as follows: S5.3.5 Any source of illumination within the passenger compartment which is forward of a transverse vertical plane 4.35 inch (ll0.6 mm) rearward of the manikin 'H' point with the driver's seat in its rearmost driving position, which is not used for the controls and displays regulated by this standard, which is not a telltale, and which is capable of being illuminated while the vehicle is in motion, shall have either (l) light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness, (2) a single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions, or (3) a means of being turned off. This requirement does not apply to buses that are normally operated with the passenger compartment illuminated. The first issue raised by your letter is whether section S5.3.5 would apply to your proposed design. The answer to that question is yes. You suggested that the section might not apply, since 'display illumination turns 'on' or 'off' simultaneously with the 'on' or 'off' operation of radio switch irrespective of vehicle motion.' However, section S5.3.5's limitation of applicability to sources of illumination which are 'capable of being illuminated while the vehicle is in motion' does not refer to illuminations which are provided only when the vehicle is in motion but instead incorporates all sources of illumination which are 'capable' of being illuminated while the vehicle is in motion. The second issue raised by your letter is whether your proposed design meets the requirements of section S5.3.5. You suggested that the 'off' switch of the radio would be 'a means of being turned off,' under that section. We agree with your suggested interpretation. Section S5.3.5 requires that the 'source of illumination' have either (l) light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness, (2) a single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions, or (3) a means of being turned off. As discussed in the preamble to the February 3, l987 final rule, the purpose of providing section S5.3.5's three options was to meet concerns raised by commenters, while maintaining essential limits on glare. Although a driver may use the radio while driving at night, he or she will have the means to remove the radio as a source of glare by turning the radio off. In our view, this meets section S5.3.5's third option. Sincerely, Erika Z. Jones Chief Counsel"; |
|
ID: aiam2441OpenMr. James A. Rupp, Vice President and General Manager, Kustom Fit of Ohio, Inc., P.O. Box 216, Pioneer, OH 43554; Mr. James A. Rupp Vice President and General Manager Kustom Fit of Ohio Inc. P.O. Box 216 Pioneer OH 43554; Dear Mr. Rupp: This responds to your April 30, 1976 request for confirmation tha 'liability' for the correct location of a vehicle's seating reference point (SRP) lies with a vehicle manufacturer or alterer that installs seating and not with the manufacturer of the seat. I regret that we have not responded to your request sooner.; >>>'Seating reference point' is defined by NHTSA regulations (49 CFR 571.3) to mean --; . . . .the manufacturer's design reference point which -- (a) Establishes the rearmost normal design driving or riding positio of each designated seating position in a vehicle,; (b) Has coordinates established relative to the designed vehicl structure,; (c) Simulates the position of the pivot center of the human torso an thigh, and; (d) Is the reference point employed to position the two dimensiona templates described in SAE recommended Practice J826, 'Manikins for Use in Defining Vehicle Seating Accommodation', November 1962.<<<; While the term 'manufacturer' found in the beginning of this definitio could refer to either a vehicle or equipment manufacturer under the relevant statutory definition (15 U.S.C. & (sic) 102(5)), the references in subparagraphs (a) and (b) make clear that the SRP is a location established with reference to the vehicle structure. It is a commonly understood reference point for specifying the available space for a seated occupant within a vehicle. The only exception to this relationship to the vehicle has been in the case of Standard No. 222, *School Bus Passenger Seating and Crash Protection*, where the NHTSA has indicated it would accept an SRP designation that is established with reference to the seat frame. This policy is limited to school buses where seat placement within the vehicle is subject to more variation than in other vehicle types.; This means that the NHTSA, in verifying the compliance of a vehicl with a standard such as Standard No. 210, *Seat Belt Anchorages*, will ask the vehicle manufacturer for the location of the SRP.; Sincerely, Frank A. Berndt, Acting Chief Counsel |
|
ID: 16055.ogmOpenMr. Freeman Chen Dear Mr. Chen: This responds to your letter regarding your company's intention to produce a small flat screen LCD television receiver which would be suitable for use in passenger cars. Specifically, you ask if there are any guidelines or regulations regarding the size of the television, special feature requirements, or any restrictions on where these televisions may be installed in a vehicle. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) does not have any safety standards specifically covering television receivers. However, it is possible that the installation of a television receiver could affect the compliance of a vehicle with some safety standards. All new vehicles manufactured for sale in the United States must be certified by their manufacturer as complying with the Federal motor vehicle safety standards. If your television receivers are installed in a new vehicle prior to its first sale to a consumer, the manufacturer or dealer would be required to certify that the vehicle as altered continues to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards. After a vehicle is sold at retail, Federal law limits the modifications made to it by manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and repair businesses. These entities are prohibited under 49 U.S.C. section 30122 from "knowingly making inoperative" any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle in compliance with an applicable safety standard. In general, the "make inoperative" prohibition would require a business which modifies motor vehicles to ensure that they do not remove, disconnect, or degrade the performance of safety equipment installed in compliance with an applicable safety standard. Violations of this prohibition are punishable by civil fines up to $1,100 per violation. Depending on where and how the device is mounted, the installation of a television receiver could affect the compliance of a vehicle with some safety standards. For example, standard No. 201, Occupant protection in interior impact, establishes requirements for the performance of certain interior areas of a vehicle in protecting occupants from injury if they contact these areas in a crash. The requirements of standard 201 apply to dashboards, seat backs, visors, and other interior sections where a flat panel TV screen might be mounted. Beginning September 1, 1998, new head impact protection requirements will apply to pillars, side rails, roof headers and the roof itself. Standard No. l0l, Controls and Displays, contains requirements relating to the location, illumination, and labeling of controls and displays. One section of this standard, section S5.3.5, imposes certain requirements on illuminated devices in the vicinity of the driver. This section provides:
The purpose of this requirement is to prevent glare visible to the driver. If a television receiver installed in view of the driver is capable of operation while the vehicle is in motion, it would be subject to this requirement. While NHTSA does not have any safety standards specifically covering television receivers, the installation of a television receiver in view of the driver which is capable of operation while the vehicle is in motion would raise obvious safety concerns related to possible driver distraction. Finally, I note that state laws may cover the installation of television receivers in motor vehicles. You should contact the Department of Motor Vehicles in any state in which the equipment will be sold or used for information on state laws. I hope that this is information is helpful. If you have any questions, please contact Otto Matheke of my staff at (202) 366-5253. Sincerely, |
1998 |
ID: nht89-1.31OpenTYPE: INTERPRETATION-NHTSA DATE: 03/07/89 FROM: ERIKA Z. JONES -- CHIEF COUNSEL NHTSA TO: THERESA ROONEY -- ALPINE ELECTRONICS OF AMERICA, INC. TITLE: NONE ATTACHMT: LETTER DATED 02/26/87 FROM THERESA ROONEY TO ED GLANCY -- NHTSA, RE FMVSS 101, OCC 1676 TEXT: Dear Ms. Rooney: This responds to your letter requesting an interpretation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 101, Controls and Displays. We apologize for the delay in our response. You stated that it is your understanding that any car sound system which is f actory installed must have light intensities that have two values, a higher one for day and a lower one for night; that these two light intensities do not have to be variable; and that any color may be used to illuminate the system. You asked for confir mation of this understanding. As discussed below, Standard No. 101's requirements in this area are somewhat more flexible than suggested by your letter. By way of background information, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does not provide approvals of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment. Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, it is the responsibility of the manufa cturer to ensure that its motor vehicles or equipment comply with applicable safety standards. The following represents our opinion based on the facts provided in your letter. The requirements of Standard No. 101 that are relevant to car sound systems are set forth in section S5.3.5. That section states: S5.3.5 Any source of illumination within the passenger compartment which is forward of a transverse vertical plane 4.35 inch (110.6 mm) rearward of the manikin "H" point with the driver's seat in its rearmost driving position, which is not used for th e controls and displays regulated by this standard, which is not a telltale, and which is capable of being illuminated while the vehicle is in motion, shall have either (1) light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness, (2) a single intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions, or (3) a means of being turned off. This requirement does not apply to buses that are normally operated with the passenger compartment illuminated.
With respect to car sound systems, section S.5.3.5's requirements can be summarized as follows. First, the requirements generally apply to any car sound system that is installed in a motor vehicle before its first sale to a consumer and that includes a source of illumination which is forward of the driver. Second, the section requires that any such source of illumination have either (1) light intensity which is manually or automatically adjustable to provide at least two levels of brightness, (2) a sin gle intensity that is barely discernible to a driver who has adapted to dark ambient roadway conditions, or (3) a means of being turned off. No color requirements are specified for the source of illumination of a car sound system. I would note that, at the option of the manufacturer, motor vehicles manufactured before September 1, 1989, may comply with the requirements of Standard No. 100 instead of the requirements of Standard No. 101. This provision is of relevance for some, bu t not all, car sound systems, and only for vehicles manufactured before September 1, 1989. If you desire further information about this provision, please contact us. Sincerely, |
Request an Interpretation
You may email your request to Interpretations.NHTSA@dot.gov or send your request in hard copy to:
The Chief Counsel
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, W41-326
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20590
If you want to talk to someone at NHTSA about what a request for interpretation should include, call the Office of the Chief Counsel at 202-366-2992.
Please note that NHTSA’s response will be made available in this online database, and that the incoming interpretation request may also be made publicly available.