Interpretation ID: nht89-3.4

TYPE: INTERPRETATION-NHTSA

DATE: 09/28/89

FROM: MARK F. HOLMES

TO: STEVE WOOD ASST. CHIEF COUNSEL N.H.T.S.A., U.S. DEPT. OF TRANPORTATION (MOTOR VEHICLES)

TITLE: NONE

ATTACHMT: ATTACHED TO LETTER DATED 10/31/89 FROM STEPHEN P. WOOD -- NHTSA TO MARK F. HOLMES; REDBOOK A34; USA 108 [A][2][A]; STANDARD 108; LETTER DATED 09/28/89 FROM MARK F. HOLMES TO STEVE WOOD -- NHTSA

TEXT: Dear Mr. Wood:

Prior to my phone conversation with one of your associates, Mr. Vincent, enclosed please review a literary introduction letter along with a colorful illustration for two multi-purpose lighting devices called the Strobalarm and the Spotlight Alarms.

I am presently interested in presenting both items to a manufacturer for an after market device for commercial usage.

Before I can proceed with this presentation, I need to know that these devices and their features would not be in violation of any standards or regulations that have been established by your department.

I feel as though that by knowing first hand that these devices would not be challenged by law and would not be denied a patent or marketing rights because of an infraction based on it's usage and raw materials.

The Strobalarm and the Spotlight Alarm, are two devices that are designed to be used only when a vehicle is parked or broken down in a given area.

A speedy response from your department would be valued and appreciated.

Sincerely,