Skip to main content
You can also sort pages by filters.
Table of Contents
Download the Full Book

Effectiveness: Proven for increasing convictions 3 Star Proven for increasing convictions Cost: $
Use: Low
Time: Short

In court monitoring programs, people observe, track, and report on DWI court or administrative hearings. Court monitoring provides data on how many cases are dismissed or pled down to lesser offenses, how many result in convictions, what sanctions are imposed, and how these results compare across different judges and different courts. Court monitoring programs usually are operated and funded by citizen organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Use: As of 2006 court monitoring programs were active in at least 13 States.[1] It is generally believed that court monitoring has decreased substantially since the mid-1980s, when Probst et al. (1987) identified over 300 programs in the United States.

Effectiveness: Shinar (1992) found that court-monitored cases in Maine produced higher conviction rates and stiffer sentences than unmonitored cases. Probst et al. (1987) found that judges, prosecutors, and other officials in 51 communities believed that court monitoring programs helped increase DWI arrests, decrease plea agreements, and increase guilty pleas.

Costs: The main requirement for a court monitoring program is a reliable supply of monitors. Monitors typically are unpaid volunteers from advocacy groups like MADD, or similar organizations. Modest funds are needed to establish and maintain court monitoring records and to publicize the results.

Time to implement: Court monitoring programs can be implemented very quickly if volunteer monitors are available. A few weeks will be required to set up the program and train monitors.


[1] Personal communication with Joey Syner, highway safety specialist, NHTSA.